![]() |
||
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Nov 2001
文章: 1,397
|
NVIDIA=說一套,做一套...
自從NVIDIA上次發表那篇driver optimization guidelines後,
咱們來看看NVIDIA這次又對3DMark03搞出什麼飛機... ![]() http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/gffx/gffx-13.html Again, NVIDIA's drivers use some cheats. This time it's connected not with shaders, but with forced compression of semitransparent textures which are used to form puffs of smoke. This explains the speed boost that was seen above. The pictures of both companies differ from the reference one and from each other. Where is FutureMark now which a while go blamed cheaters so angrily and released the patch 3.30 where all things allegedly fell back into place? We don't see whether the reference pictures are considered correct. Or maybe these are not cheats but useful optimizations? But a picture must be rendered as the developers planned, mustn't it? Where's the truth? 44.65又被逮到作弊了, 這次不是致換掉GT4的shader,而是強制壓縮用來產生煙霧效果的半透明材質,降低畫質...以提升3DMark03的成績... 截圖比較請參閱上面的review... 看看這次NVIDIA這次又違反了幾條guidelines? ![]() 1.Don't negatively impact image quality 2.Benefit more than benchmarks 3.Provide actual performance increases for real games |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Nov 2002 您的住址: 地球村Universal
文章: 768
|
呵呵.........沒辦法了
誰叫她是大廠GPU 設計公司..... |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Elite Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Jun 2001 您的住址: 地球
文章: 6,234
|
Futuremark: Nvidia milord, those massmedia said you cheat in our benchmark again...
![]() Nvidia: can't u told them it's just optimization, idiot? ![]() Futuremark: ye..yes milord... ![]()
__________________
~愛由一個笑容開始,用一個吻來成長,用一滴眼淚來結束。 當你出生時你一個人在哭,而所有在旁的在笑,因此請活出你的生命, 當你死的時候,圍繞你的人在哭而你便是唯一在笑。~ 此文章於 2003-07-27 11:07 PM 被 blair 編輯. |
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Feb 2003 您的住址: 台灣
文章: 4,036
|
無所謂
顯示卡晶片還有一家叫做ATI的公司有出 ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Oct 2000 您的住址: 躺在美麗撫子的懷裡
文章: 10,113
|
目前顯示卡市場已經進入寡佔市場
互有作弊或是有私下協議也不是不可能 |
![]() |
![]() |
Golden Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Apr 2001
文章: 2,513
|
引用:
這真的是把 nVidia 和 FM 的關係說的太貼切了 夠幽默 ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Major Member
![]() 加入日期: Aug 2001
文章: 116
|
2間公司的跟reference的都差很多
只是nv明顯65又有小動作 ati則跟之前一樣 有趣的是 nv+antidetector 比 ati 的更接近reference |
![]() |
![]() |