是啊! 是啊! 天下就您最對, 就您最聰明. 就連英美兩國的工業設計教育都得請您蒞臨指導, 讓他們專心設計外觀就好.

http://www.pcdvd.com.tw/showpost.ph...3&postcount=336

言歸正傳, 那就專談仿冒好了. 開開眼界看看大公司為什麼要高薪請律師當法律顧問. I

Apple 對別人的抄襲仿冒
********************************************
http://www.zdnet.com.tw/news/ce/0,2...20090502,00.htm
蘋果Tiger新版OS被指抄襲 CNET新聞專區： Ina Fried 2004/06/29 12:52

雖然蘋果電腦預期新版Mac OS X Tiger將掀起一個流行跟風，但一位開發人員則表示其實新版Mac就是抄襲來的。
Arlo Rose表示蘋果執行長Steve Jobs在週一公布的蘋果Dashboard軟體與他自己開發的Konfabulator(售價25美元的Mac程式)實在太雷同了。兩套程式都可輕鬆存取所謂的Widgets小程式(可執行一些實用小任務)。「這是在太可恥了，」Rose在電話專訪中表示，「他們至少要跟我們合作，或者付費購買才是。」蘋果則堅稱Dashboard是公司的原創產品，並表示Widgets一直都是Mac OS X與NextSteop OS的一部份。「這不是他的東西，而是我們自己開發出來的。」蘋果資深副總裁Phil Schiller表示。

Rose與搭檔Perry Clarke是在2003年二月推出Konfabulator，「當時市面上根本沒有類似的程式，」Rose表示，現在市面上則有許多類似的產品。Rose認為蘋果這種踐踏第三方開發人員的作法將扼殺開發人員撰寫Mac程式的誘因。「開發人員幹嘛賣命替他們的平台工作？」引發此次爭議的蘋果向來以帶動創新為傲，例如在這次會場上就貼出一系列海報影射微軟會在下一版Windows版本(Longhorn)中抄襲蘋果的功能。其中一句標語寫著：「微軟，準備好影印機吧。」不過Mac OS X被外界認為闖入他人地盤也非第一次。蘋果之前擴大Sherlock搜尋工具的搜尋範圍，把電影及黃頁都加了進來，但所採取的格式與第三方工具Watson有諸多雷同之處。

Rose目前只能趕緊把握Tiger還沒推出的這段期間。「蘋果，準備好影印機吧！」Konfabulator的最新首頁換上了這句標語。上面同時還寫著：「何必等到2005年上半季？你現在就可享用正宗的Dashboard程式。」不過Rose也知道長期而言他將無法與該作業程式內建的功能做競爭。「我們只能改道其他平台，不然就是改做其他專案了。」(陳奭璁)
********************************************

言歸正傳, 那就專談仿冒好了. 開開眼界看看大公司為什麼要高薪請律師當法律顧問. II

有圖有真相, Apple 對別人的抄襲仿冒 II -- 嚴以待人寬以律己
********************************************
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!_Widgets
Yahoo! Widgets is a free application platform for Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. The software was previously called Konfabulator, but after being acquired by computer services company Yahoo! it was rebranded. ......

"Dashboard versus Konfabulator" Debate
Many people have made comparisons between Konfabulator and Apple's Dashboard, especially after Apple announced the feature while Mac OS X v10.4 was in development. It was a subject of debate on the online community following the few months before Mac OS X Tiger's official release.

One school of thought came to the conclusion that Dashboard was a "rip-off" of Konfabulator. They point out the visual and functional similarities between Dashboard and Konfabulator, and the fact that both programs used the term "widgets" to describe the applications they ran. Indeed, Apple was using the term "gadgets" to describe the widgets Dashboard ran before switching to "widgets" during the course of Mac OS X Tiger's development for unknown reasons, and that both have widgets that used several modern Internet technologies. ...................

X1 Also, despite the similarities, there are some underlying differences between both programs. The widget X2 engine is different; Konfabulator Widgets use XML and JavaScript. However, X3 Dashboard widgets use HTML and Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) along with JavaScript, and can display themselves in the Safari web browser as if they were web pages. The operation of widgets in both environments is also different; Konfabulator Widgets can be set to be visible on the desktop (This can be done with Dashboard through the Terminal), as well as to appear only when Konsposé is activated. Also, Konfabulator Widget preferences are usually set using a dialog box, accessible by bringing up the context menu of each Widget. However, Dashboard widgets cannot normally stay on the desktop, and the preferences of each widget is set by "flipping" over the widgets and setting any options on the "back" of the widget itself.
********************************************
X1 什麼 Dashboard 和 Konfabulator 除了外表類似之外, 就不是抄襲仿冒?
Apple 不是堅持只要Super Shuffle 和 iPod Shuffle 只要外表類似就是侵權嗎?

X2 什麼 Dashboard 和 Konfabulator 內部解譯引擎不同, 就不是抄襲仿冒?
Apple 不是堅稱即使 Super Shuffle 和 iPod Shuffle 內部結構, 解碼晶片, 線路佈局都不同, Apple 仍然堅持要告茂嘉抄襲仿冒的侵權行為!?

X3 什麼 Dashboard 比 Konfabulator 多了 HTML 與 CSS...功能就不是抄襲仿冒?
Apple 不是堅持即使 Super Shuffle 比 iPod Shuffle 多了 FM 與錄音功能, Super Shuffle 還是對 iPod Shuffle 構成侵權嗎?

沒臉承認自己錯誤就說一聲
東拉西扯一堆幹什麼

簡單回答 茂嘉有沒有抄襲 有沒有罪啦

東拉西扯不會讓我們忘記你講的天方夜譚
只會讓人更看不起你

東扯什麼輪胎形狀
西拉蘋果抄襲
也改變不暸茂嘉抄襲 你的論點錯誤這兩點

言歸正傳, 那就專談仿冒好了. 開開眼界看看大公司為什麼要高薪請律師當法律顧問. III

老美正反兩方對此事的看法
********************************************
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/artic...L&type=business
Independent developer calls Tiger's Dashboard a copycat

http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/...ves/002905.html
Tiger takes on Longhorn

http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/...ves/002916.html
Apple's Konfabulator? June 29, 2004

Apparently Microsoft isn't the only software company with a penchant for "borrowing" good ideas from others. The people behind an independent product called Konfabulator are pointing out the striking similarity between their product for the Mac and a new feature Apple unveiled yesterday, called Dashboard, which will be part of the forthcoming "Tiger" release of the Mac OS X.

The headline on the Konfabulator home page is "Cupertino, start your photocopiers, a reference to Apple's earlier "Redmond, start your photocopiers" jab at Microsoft.

But like they say, there's no such thing as bad publicity. In that way, this turn of events might not be all bad for Konfabulator. Before yesterday, I'd never heard of the product. Last night, after reading about it on the Corante site, I downloaded it and tried out some of the desktop "widgets." I'm sure I wasn't alone. Posted by Todd Bishop at June 29, 2004 12:22 PM

Comments

I don't know if you remember them, but Apple used to have a framework similar to Konfabulator and you could access things within that framework from the Apple menu: Desk Accessories! In my opinion, Konfabulator's developers simply revamped the Desk Accessory idea for Mac OS X, and should not feel bad that Apple is doing the same. Once we had System 7 with its multitasking, desk accessories were just lumped in with all other applications, and the old Apple menu was expanded to include anything you wanted. The folks making Konfabulator (and now Dashboard) realized that Desk Accessories were actually quite useful because they brought common tools all into one spot that could be accessed quickly from anywhere. They could even have been described as "widgets" that you could use within the desk accessory framework, and developers could make their own desk accessories. Apple didn't complain when Konfabulator stole the Desk Accessories from them, and Konfabulator's developers shouldn't be upset now that Apple has brought Desk Accessories back into their OS after years of absence... even if they did probably get the idea to bring them back by seeing Konfabulator. Posted by: Matthew Smith at June 29, 2004 04:20 PM

Konfabulator stole its ideas from Apple's Desk Accessories - which came out on the Mac OS in 1984. Apple brought back Desk Accessories in the form of the Dashboard. Posted by: James Katt at June 29, 2004 05:30 PM

Oh, yeah, now that you say it, I remember having the calculator, etc., under the apple menu. (Is that what you're referring to?) But that still seems to be a long way from being able to press a function key to overlay a whole slate of programs across the desktop.

At any rate, you guys aren't alone in what you're saying. Check out this quote from a blurb on Dashboard toward the end of this MacFixIt story http://www.macfixit.com/article.php...004062903391029 :
"MacFixIt founder and contributor Ted Landau commented to me that widgets remind him of early Mac OS Desk Accessories." Posted by: Todd Bishop at June 29, 2004 05:52 PM

Damm Todd, Wintard comes to mind when I read this crap. I can only wonder if your computer history only goes back ten years. Here a few links to read up on:

http://www.folklore.org/StoryView.p...e&detail=medium

http://developer.apple.com/document...Devices-16.html Posted by: Joe at June 29, 2004 06:02 PM
********************************************

你不知道天下就是信口雌黃的你最對嗎? 引經據典網路查證哪有您信口胡說來得準確!

你連引錯了都不知道
跟你比起來
當然我最對
腦殘
我都強調請你看懂他再說啥了
你還看不懂 那我能說啥
腦殘

哪像妳連判斷自己飲的是啥的能力都沒有
引出來的資料還會自打嘴巴

好啦 你知道氣動工具到底是啥了沒
你估到IPOD的電路板設計圖証明是公版了沒
你估到IPOD接受度很低 不具知名度 外觀沒特色 沒有廣為人知的證據了沒
你啥都沒估到~"~

你連OS X 10.3版跟IPOD都分不清楚了嗎?
腦殘