|
||
|
*停權中*
加入日期: May 2004
文章: 2,140
|
他可是吹出名的呀
從生物到物理化學無所不包 最有名的 就是狗事件了 |
|||||||
2007-12-27, 07:59 PM
#111
|
|
|
New Member
加入日期: Dec 2006
文章: 2
|
這法官和法庭是怎樣..就是不尊重設計...到國外的競爭才會弱，到國外那間公司就被吃的死死了吧，還有本錢大小聲!?
還獅子大開口的樣子要求一億"美金"賠償，真感覺..不喜歡討厭就是了...!?。 |
||
|
2007-12-27, 08:36 PM
#112
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Jan 2002 您的住址: 台北
文章: 172
|
引用:
是因為官司的關係才沒繼續做下去吧，而且外觀本來就有專利， 如果廠商真的完全自己開發，提出相關文件如研發記錄等資料， 相信頂多就是庭外和解，不置於敗訴。提不出來另當別論。 在網路上批評時事應該不涉及辱罵，廠商應該注意自己的行為， 而不是在論壇上警告網友，如有任何疑問，歡迎請貴公司律師來聯絡 |
|
|
2007-12-27, 09:09 PM
#113
|
|
|
Regular Member
 
加入日期: Jun 2004
文章: 51
|
http://shopping.pchome.com.tw/?mod=...GAF00-A18279058
還有這一款，根本就是外型一模一樣，價格卻是天差地別。
__________________
AMD Barton 2500 Abit NF7-S V2.0 BENQ 800A Pioneer A09 Olympus Turbo MO 640S III SHARP HRD1 Nikon D50 Nikon F50 Nikon FM2 Tokina AT-X Pro 28-70mm F2.8 Sigma 12-24mm F4.5-5.6 EX DG ASPHERICAL HSM 2006.05.21購入 ==Liusir== |
|
2007-12-27, 09:26 PM
#114
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: May 2002
文章: 875
|
引用:
你要是有真本事就請針對這議題本身發表您的高見. 至於本人所言倒是根據網路上他人公開的訊息, 您要是有疑問不妨發文質問原始發文者. 您要是覺得自己有點墨水倒是不妨寫出您的高見. 其他質疑的部份就免了. 強中自有強中手, 一山還有一山高! 此文章於 2007-12-28 04:56 PM 被 nzcym 編輯. |
|
|
2007-12-28, 04:54 PM
#115
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: May 2002
文章: 875
|
引用:
就看你哪一年才能辜出 "茂嘉的iPod開模PO" 來證實你的理論 ! |
|
|
2007-12-28, 05:01 PM
#116
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: May 2002
文章: 875
|
引用:
1. 本人與 茂嘉 無絲毫瓜葛. 上述文句來自轉貼引用 http://yuyulaw.info/wordpress/科技�.../#comment-39352 2 外觀本來就有專利 !? 您看過福特汽車的汽車外形專利或是固特異輪胎的輪胎外形專利嗎? 您有看過三角形或是六角形....等等非圓形的輪胎嗎? 3. iPod 專利本身就有問題, 法官未加細查. 判決似有草率疏忽之疑! http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/0...t_apple_patent/ Microsoft, Apple 'spar over iPod patent' Apple's rotation application, we discover, received its first NFR on September 29, 2004 and was bounced again on June 13 this year. But Platt's playlist application also has a rejection history. It received an NFR on 17 November 2002, and a more serious Final Rejection on 14 June 2004. After further documentation was received, and extension granted, the application received another NFR on 11 December last year. Apple has filed a number of applications to protect the iPod and iTunes user interfaces, including 60/359,551 ("Touch Pad for Handheld Device") and 60/387,692 ("Method and Apparatus for Use of Rotational User Inputs"). Apple is facing two infringement suits claiming the iPod violates existing IP. http://www.news.com/Microsoft,-Appl..._3-5830435.html http://www.appleinsider.com/article..._interface.html Apple fails to patent iPod interface http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4510044.stm Apple faces iPod patent dispute |
|
|
2007-12-28, 05:23 PM
#117
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Aug 2003 您的住址: 冷熱冰的故鄉
文章: 129
|
引用:
只手工作出兩台原型機就開放上商場讓人預約 就跟藥�**晹b對老鼠試驗的時候就申請核准上市一樣 那家廠商有那個膽啊? 要屁之前用點腦好不好 不要只會凹啊 大濕~~~~~! http://www.pconline.com.cn/digital/...510/716078.html 連對岸都有對比評測了 只有兩台手工原型機的話還要輪流跨國送來送去測來測去 會不會太為難那2台展示機啊 大濕~~~ 此文章於 2007-12-28 06:01 PM 被 aoki_rin 編輯. |
|
|
2007-12-28, 05:52 PM
#118
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: May 2002
文章: 875
|
引用:
你大概看不懂英文吧 !? iPod 方向鍵專利本身就有問題, 法官未加細查. 判決似有草率疏忽之疑! http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/0...t_apple_patent/ Microsoft, Apple 'spar over iPod patent' Apple's rotation application, we discover, received its first NFR on September 29, 2004 and was bounced again on June 13 this year. But Platt's playlist application also has a rejection history. It received an NFR on 17 November 2002, and a more serious Final Rejection on 14 June 2004. After further documentation was received, and extension granted, the application received another NFR on 11 December last year. Apple has filed a number of applications to protect the iPod and iTunes user interfaces, including 60/359,551 ("Touch Pad for Handheld Device") and 60/387,692 ("Method and Apparatus for Use of Rotational User Inputs"). Apple is facing two infringement suits claiming the iPod violates existing IP. http://www.news.com/Microsoft,-Appl..._3-5830435.html http://www.appleinsider.com/article..._interface.html Apple fails to patent iPod interface http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4510044.stm Apple faces iPod patent dispute |
|
|
2007-12-28, 06:30 PM
#119
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Aug 2003 您的住址: 冷熱冰的故鄉
文章: 129
|
引用:
你大概無法理解地球語言吧!? 我哪時跟你討論過他的專利問題? 我批的是你辜個只有兩台同型機的屁話也沒搞清楚就丟上來護航 這種東西就是老子明擺了要抄,只要我抓準法律規定的最底限,你就奈何不了我 今天茂嘉贏也好輸也好,那是法官給他的判決 就算今天法官判茂嘉勝訴蘋果還要賠他兩百億美金 我還是看不起茂嘉 還是不會去買我認定的仿冒品 了解嗎?需不需要我去找火星文翻譯器把以上翻成火星文以方便你理解? |
|
|
2007-12-28, 06:40 PM
#120
|
|
