|
||
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Jul 2003 您的住址: 雅閣裡(Ugly)
文章: 255
|
HONDA R20與最後的K20?
現任的civic 2.0S,應該是最後的K20吧?
CRV/ACCORD2.0一律換成SOHC R20. 這兩顆心臟,大家有何看法.比較心得? http://www.honda-taiwan.com.tw/tech/tech/ivtec.html   |
|||||||
2009-09-16, 11:53 AM
#1
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Jan 2008
文章: 351
|
新一代引擎主要考量是在於經濟性
比較環保(頭段觸媒) 比較節能(SOHC&油氣回吐) 比較省錢(可用92) K聲浪較佳?! |
||
|
2009-09-16, 01:33 PM
#2
|
|
|
Master Member
  
加入日期: Feb 2004 您的住址: 加拿大
文章: 2,391
|
應該還是會有性能級引擎吧, 不然 type-R / -S 要用啥?
__________________
Rule #12: Never date a co-worker. Rule #13: Never involve lawyers. Rule #23: Never mess with a Marine's coffee if you want to live! Rule #51: Sometimes you are wrong 純白の吸血鬼は微笑む：私を殺した責任、とってもらうからわ - アルクエイド ブリュンスッド 貴方に出逢い STAR輝いて アタシが生まれて Was aus Liebe gethan wird, geschieht immer Jenseits von Gut und Böse - Friedrick Wilhelm Nietzsche Cain was the first man ever to strike down another... and when the Lord came to him and said ‘What have you done!?’, Cain could not hide his crime. For the voice of his brother’s blood cried out from the very ground The world has been your battlefield, everywhere you go. The blood of brothers and sons screams out against you. Perhaps you cannot yet hear it, because the soil is not your own, but you will... you will |
|
2009-09-16, 02:22 PM
#3
|
|
|
Master Member
加入日期: Aug 2003 您的住址: 無苦庵
文章: 1,943
|
R20可視為R18擴缸, 單凸歸單凸, 低速反應好,
i-VTEC的提前點火可造就比較早出現的扭力峰值. 對不要求高轉反應的車型來說, 單凸本來就比較合理, 兩個凸沒比較好, 看看B20B! 至於K20目前是本田的2.0L神主牌, 模組化之下降低成本, 普通輸出, K20Z就OK, 暴力一點的高轉反應, K20A3之流來對應.
__________________
 10年 |
|
2009-09-16, 02:37 PM
#4
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Jul 2003 您的住址: 雅閣裡(Ugly)
文章: 255
|
引用:
再加上用在一般市售車上,還游刃有餘 引用:
沒錯,依然是紅頭K20A 只是一般市售車普遍都被R系取代了 引用:
R18.R20接下來會是R24? R系是否缺乏可塑性(性能版)? ~~~ 綜合來說,不曉得新R系取代K系列,獲得多少效益? (這可能要問Honda嚇就桑.) 或者純粹為了維持i-VTEC油耗節能上的口碑與領先地位? (當然,這沒什不好啦) |
|||
|
2009-09-16, 05:34 PM
#5
|
|
