很難聽嗎?

裡面只提到supermicro的CASE比較好啊???

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Pyeron
> Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 16:04
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Building a Back Blaze style POD
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John R Pierce
> > Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 15:24
> > To: centos at centos.org
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Building a Back Blaze style POD
> >
> > On 05/08/11 12:06 PM, Jason wrote:
> > > Rudy,
> > >
> > >
> > > Do you have a recommendation of a motherboard?
> > >
> > > I am still reading the rest of your post. Thanks!
> >
> > most any server board that supports dual intel xeon
> 5500/5600 will let
> > you pretty easily add 24GB per CPU socket while using relatively
> > affordable 4GB dimms.
> >
> > http://www.supermicro.com/products/.../QPI/5500/X8DA6.
> > cfm?SAS=N
> > or whatever
> >
> > you might look at these chassis, which are, IMHO, better engineered
> > than that backblaze thing
> >
> http://www.supermicro.com/products/...7E16-R1400U.cfm

And http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1149005

>
>
> If you can use less drives, this would be more cost effective
> (time building & time fixing)
>
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...N82E16811219038 [400$]
>
> And then if you wwant raid:
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...=N82E1681611814
1 [1300$] or
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...N82E16816115095 [700$]
>
> >
> > this supports 36 SAS/SATA drives in a 4U (24 in front, 12 in
> > back) and has SAS2 backplane multiplexers so you don't need
> nearly as
> > many SAS/SATA cards
> >

ps, I hate Outlook.

--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 -
- +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 -
- -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.