當發現撿到的是錢, 並積極主張"得"請求的三成報酬時, 大家譴責的是道德低下而不是法律..
怎麼會有藉以法論法之辭, 掩飾貪得無厭之實??

外國的月亮不一定比較圓, 但是難道我們看的月亮就比較扁?

拾金不昧是法律責任嗎?
加州刑事法第485 條非常清楚的規定, 撿到遺失物品時, 若知道失主是誰,或當前有尋訪物主的方法, 卻沒有使用合理的努力來將物品歸還失主, 而且將遺失物品收為己有或作為自己專用, 便構成偷竊罪.
若拾遺者收取遺失物品的企圖是想利用該物向失主討索獎金, 便是將失物做為自己專用的行為. 在這種情況下, 偷竊罪亦可成立.

iPhone4原型機外流事件
Section 485 of the California Penal Code:
One who finds lost property under circumstances which give him knowledge of or means of inquiry as to the true owner, and who appropriates such property to his own use, or to the use of another person not entitled thereto, without first making reasonable and just efforts to find the owner and to restore the property to him, is guilty of theft.