引用:
|
作者chlang
不知道有沒有可能是, ATi 顯示的時候會吃掉較多的資源, 因此降速.
而相反地, NV 可能有某些方式可以降低顯示時吃掉的資源, 因此顯示出來的性能就比較好.
如果真的如這樣所猜測. 那可以嘗試著兩邊都縮小, 然後直接看產量.
|
http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?p=30141#p30141
One question, and please, be honest if possible.
Currently NV-CUDA GPU2 fahcore uses only 3 - 5% of 1 CPU core in Vista. While ATI CAL GPU2 fahcore eats up almost any CPU... And I hear that for 4850 no CPU can feed it up...
Is this a problem within R600 - RV670 - RV... architecture itself AND WON'T CHANGE MUCH, or this is just poor optimization of either CAL or FahCore_11 for ATI?
http://sbt.idv.tw/blog/tiberius/2008/06/29/838