這段影片是杜撰的，根本沒有龍的遺體被發現，這個故事是被創作出來的。doscovery很可惡，居然沒有在影片上補充說明...，連台灣網站上也沒有任何具體的說明！

在英文網站上找到許多資料，其中有個網站是比較簡單而清楚的。以下的訪談很清楚的指出，這個故事是編劇Foley的創作。更多的細節請見：

http://www.scifi.com/sfw/interviews/sfw1885.html


What kind of empirical evidence did you find to prove that dragons actually existed, and at what point did you have to extrapolate a throughline to explain the continuity of their existence?

Foley: We're not out to prove that dragons existed. We're just saying, "What if dragons existed? Wouldn't it be really cool if they did?" and just kind of have everybody go along on the ride with us. But, so you know, we are telling a story here, and I think it is a story that I think is an enduring story and a story that is so universal.

2006-03-13 16:37 補充
補充一下問答翻譯：

記者問：你有找到任何證據可以證明龍是真的存在嗎？你是以什麼樣的觀點去推斷龍的演進存活？

編劇答：我們並不是為了證明龍真的存在過，我們只是認為：『龍會不會真的存在呢？如果龍真的存在那有多酷？』我們只是希望大家跟我們一樣去想想。其實，我們只是再敘述一個故事，ㄧ個已經流傳久遠廣為人知的故事...。