|
||
|
New Member
加入日期: Jan 2005
文章: 8
|
我想請問一下喔~雖然晚了一點~~但是我想了一下~~
精星是技嘉的子公司沒錯吧??最高領導人是同一人吧??(我是不知道啦) 問題來了~小弟剛剛去看了一下"不會吧!! (上市公司-精星) 9550GT如意版也REMARK DRAM!!" (http://forum.pcdvd.com.tw/showthread.php?t=430243)想看的去看~不過鎖版了 我覺得精星沒有必要冒著remark的風險吧~精星是上市公司~又有母公司"技嘉"支持著 以那麼大的一家公司來說~~他沒有必要砸自己的腳吧~雖然目前情況大家都很清楚了~~ |
|||||||
2005-01-07, 06:08 PM
#961
|
|
|
Basic Member
加入日期: Jan 2005
文章: 10
|
引用:
u probly don't know some corsiar ram has same model number but require different voltage, that is why they say range 2.6-2.8 not "exact 2.7", for overclocking resister control flow of voltage V=IR, by increase resistance u increase voltage. same idea u can't sue corsair b/c ur set need 2.8V to run @ 500mhz and ur friend's set use 2.6. apply that to remark situation 引用:
here is my problem, we have no evident that tripex remark it themself, they might have rights to do so, or they did not do it. with out proper evident, we can't "ASSUME" they are the evil hands |
||||
|
2005-01-07, 06:10 PM
#962
|
|
|
Basic Member
加入日期: Jan 2005
文章: 10
|
god, THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH REMAKE RAM, GET THAT IS UR HEAD. is like buy sony and print ur company name and tune down a little
|
|
2005-01-07, 06:11 PM
#963
|
|
|
Master Member
  
加入日期: Oct 2004
文章: 1,505
|
引用:
好屌的證據  爆發前和爆發後的對照耶  消保官應該很需要這個  啟亨去死吧 
__________________
 
|
|
|
2005-01-07, 06:19 PM
#964
|
|
|
Basic Member
加入日期: Jan 2005
文章: 10
|
website can not count as evident
|
|
2005-01-07, 06:24 PM
#965
|
|
|
Senior Member
 加入日期: Jul 2002 您的住址: 光碟托盤
文章: 1,495
|
Triplex 的上頭已經做好當美國人的準備了的樣子
Samsung 有授權Triplex 用他們的 mark??? |
|
2005-01-07, 06:29 PM
#966
|
|
|
Basic Member
加入日期: Jan 2005
文章: 10
|
引用:
all of us have no proof to say yes or no on that, and please read carefuly and as i say triplex may or may not have anthhig to do with it, since so many compnay use remark ram!!! 引用:
hummm...what the hell is that mean? u saying they runing away? why? no point to do so! and no point to drag another country with out reason...we have fucking lame china to deal with already |
||
|
2005-01-07, 06:34 PM
#967
|
|
|
Major Member
加入日期: Jan 2005 您的住址: 台北觀光果園
文章: 291
|
再來兩張報導....
資料來源
威寶馬有限公司 http://www.famoustec.com/news/news.htm 啟亨百目獸9550 有直接亮出"A-DATA"的版本??  另外 被大陸網站抄來抄去的9550測試報告 例如 http://www.coolaler.com/article/article.php/159 上面的記憶體顆粒.......??  |
|
2005-01-07, 06:38 PM
#968
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Apr 2002 您的住址: 桃園
文章: 370
|
唉唷，啦啦隊只敢用英文"加油"了嗎???怕被公幹???怕被公幹就不要來，不然請你用中文打出來，如果你說的是合法、合理、合情的，沒人會公幹你，如果是"正牌啦啦隊"的話......就不要怪網友公幹你。
|
|
2005-01-07, 06:51 PM
#969
|
|
|
Major Member
加入日期: Aug 2002
文章: 112
|
又來了個NEW REGISTRANT? "ALLANPAN"
怎不用中文?怕被公幹?? 你的文字(WORDS)似乎言之有理,但還是有些盲點!! 1. 很遺憾的,啟亨的SPEC.,記憶體時脈是200MHz,若overclocker 抱怨的是超過200MHz,那就沒啥好說了.問題是啟亨設的是166MHz阿?而且他自己是故意降頻的.知道自己的東西達不到標準還敢以正常品出貨,這不就是欺騙消費者嗎?(就算出錯貨,mix,那也是你公司內部的問題....) 2.你竟然以CORSAIR為例子?我請問你這些RAM有經過SAMSUNG的授權嗎?若沒有,這可是侵權.況且以-6冒充-4,我請問這些compoment可以pass -4的測試嗎?依你的理論,打上SAMSUNG 的MARK那它可得PASS -4的測試喔!! 3.WEBSITE的問題似乎你也沒弄清楚,WEBSITE可沒免責權喔.電信警察可不是閒閒沒事幹的. 若你是啟亨的人,勸你走正路解決問題.別再想那些有的沒的!! 除非三星承認那些RAM是他們家的,否則你們根本避不掉侵權(商標)的嫌疑. 打英文比較高竿嗎?呵...... (不好意思,小弟對MEMORY還有點了解."REMAKE RAM"嗯,好名詞.DOWN GRADE/UTD是個暴利的市場.呵...我曉得你在說什麼喔,我看看你還要爆什麼料....) |
|
2005-01-07, 06:51 PM
#970
|
|
