作者Elros

對岸的新聞翻譯隨便看看就好

QUESTION: Is the U.S.-Japan defense treaty covering the Senkaku Islands?

MR. CROWLEY: The – well, I think it`s important – if you read the transcript of the White House press briefing today, I thought Jeff Bader went through this in some detail and laid out the U.S. position. We do believe that because the Senkaku Islands are under Japanese jurisdiction, that it is covered by the U.S.-Japan security treaty.

That said, we also stress that we don』t take a position on the sovereignty of the Senkaku Islands, but recognize current Japanese jurisdiction stemming back to the reversion of Okinawa to Japan. But Jeff made a good point, I think, that – it』s worth repeating, that that said, we do not envision th...

作者Es4241

日本這次真失算了,如果老共第一次要求放人時就照辦,當然有失國格,
但第一期十天羈押期滿最好時機點,卻用進入國內司法程序,政治不能干涉司法為理由續押就大錯了,(即使續押,也該用協助海上事故調查名義)
逼老共不得不表態,完全沒有忍氣吞聲的空間(釣魚台都變成日本國內了).
結果後來日本想找個機會,雙方高層見個面,再作人情放人的機會都沒有(例如柯林頓去北韓救記者),
日本是在收到老共口頭通牒就屈服了,前倨後恭顏面無光.

樓上網友說的好,老共的官僚是精英制,頭頭都是幹幾十年實務的老胡狸,國內又一黨專政,
日本民主制,難免選出一些耍嘴皮專家當決策者,國內也沒可靠支持(為釣魚台損失稀土材料相關經濟,誰肯買單?),落得色厲內荏,落荒而逃的下場.

作者pm07g101

條約怎麼規定是一回事，美國說天安艦被北韓擊沉，美國有為南韓行使集團自衛權嗎？

美國為何不以此為由出兵毀了北韓像對伊拉克一樣？

作者卐龘卍

塞06木A拖拉庫勒

作者Es4241

(為釣魚台損失稀土材料相關經濟,誰肯買單?)