貽笑大方？熊海靈再槓長榮：不公開道歉　將留法律追訴權
2005/10/26 13:03

　記者宋玠昀、吳漢嘉、林嘉生／綜合報導

日前藝人熊海靈控訴被長榮航空惡意遺棄在法國巴黎機場，原本雙方已握手言和，不過熊海靈今(26)日再度出面，在記者會中，熊海靈說，經過兩個禮拜的追查，長榮已證實她們當時並沒有遲到，在關櫃檯後才來，不過由於長榮之前指控她貽笑大方的言論，還是始終沒道歉，熊海靈說，長榮若再不道歉，她將保留法律追訴權。

因為法國巴黎搭機事件，造成藝人熊海靈槓上了長榮，而後經過協調，雖然熊海靈和長榮航空副總聶國維雙方曾握手言和，但如今再度面臨破局。熊海靈今天召開記者會控訴之前被長榮航空惡意遺棄在法國，經過多次協商，長榮航空雖然終於查明真相，但是對於先前指控她們在國外貽笑大方的言論，長榮說什麼，都不肯道歉。

熊海靈表示，當時被長榮批評他們貽笑大方時，她心情真的非常不好，這10多天來都吃不好睡不好的，搞得她現在還胃痛。她在記者會上強調，既然長榮已經查明真相，不是她們遲到，為何不公開跟她們道歉？

熊海靈強調，雖然長榮公關劉怡君表示願意私下道歉，同時賠償住宿費用，但她堅持一定要長榮公開，因為她認為公開侮辱就不能私下道歉。她氣憤地說，長榮之所以堅持不道歉，是因為不願意開先例，所以這件事就一拖再拖，她也只能以小蝦米對抗大鯨魚。

面對熊海靈的指控，長榮態度低調，僅強調處理程序沒有錯誤，沒必要做回應。熊海靈表示，已經向消基會和消保會提出申訴，同時決定保留法律追訴權，希望長榮拿出誠意，早日解決問題，也還他們一個清白。

飛安多好？
有些事情你不知道 並不代表沒發生

http://www.asc.gov.tw/asc_ch/accide...accident_no=108

http://www.asc.gov.tw/asc_ch/accide...?accident_no=66

http://www.asc.gov.tw/asc_ch/accide...?accident_no=76

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/592651/L/

每個機場可以讓飛機容忍找乘客的時間都大不相同
像中正機場流量小只要你有check in幾乎一定要找到你才飛,也非常的好找人
像香港機場那一種流量大的時間到就照飛不等人(在香港機場要找人也是難如登天)
不然要下來的飛機會沒地方停
錯不在長榮,長榮本身不差那幾分鐘甚至半小時後才起飛,我就常常碰到
應該是塔台不允許飛機停留更久時間打亂整個起降航班

如同往常一樣 長榮的負面新聞台灣都不大會出現
所以還是很多人認為長榮飛安超好


長榮航空在anc誤用滑行道起飛

http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/stor...p-7119617c.html

Cargo jet takes off on taxiway; FAA investigates
Error is second in four years; safety a concern

By DOUG O'HARRA
Anchorage Daily News

Published: November 15, 2005
Last Modified: November 15, 2005 at 05:34 PM


An Asia-bound cargo jet was reported taking off from a taxiway instead of its assigned runway at the Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport earlier this month, prompting an investigation by the Federal Aviation Administration.


The incident, if confirmed, would mark the second time in four years that a large commercial aircraft launched from a taxiway instead of turning northwest up the runway that ends near Point Woronzof, as directed by air traffic controllers.

On Nov. 5, a MD-11 freight jet operated by Taiwan-based EVA Air was cleared to fly from runway 32, which extends more than two miles from the airport terminal area toward Knik Arm, said Scott Erickson, a safety investigator with the National Transportation Safety Board in Anchorage.

The jet had originally been moving toward a different runway, but the air traffic control tower notified the EVA Air crew that runway 32 was available and gave permission to take off there, Erickson said.

The NTSB was notified that the jet turned in the correct direction, but went up the taxiway that runs parallel to the runway on its west side, Erickson said.

Runways are the broad concrete expanses where aircraft take off and land. Taxiways are the narrower access roads used by jets and planes to reach the runways for takeoff, or move to the terminal after landing.

No other aircraft was on the taxiway at the time, and the EVA Air jet apparently flew to Taipei as planned, Erickson said.

This particular taxiway, designated "Y," is almost as long as the runway, according to an airport diagram.

"Any time you have an aircraft that doesn't follow the directions of the (air traffic) controller, it kind of puts a safety deficit in the system," Erickson said. "The FAA is looking into it."

FAA spokesman Allen Kenitzer confirmed an investigation was under way but would not comment further.

Messages left with EVA Air in Anchorage and other offices were not returned Monday.

In January 2002, a China Airlines jet carrying about 250 passengers and crew was directed to take off from runway 32, toward Point Woronzof. Instead, the jet accelerated west on another taxiway, this one only about half as long as the runway.

It barely cleared the ground: its landing gear scratched twin grooves in the snow berm as the jet became airborne. Taiwanese air safety authorities later suspended the pilot for eight months and the first officer for seven months.

The Seattle-Tacoma International Airport has experienced similar mishaps, the Seattle Times reported Sunday. At least eight times since 1999, aircraft have mistaken a certain taxiway for a runway. Three aircraft actually landed, the Times said, while five changed their flight paths at the last minute.


Daily News reporter Doug O'Harra can be reached at do'[email protected].

熊等人要是在時間內沒有去check in 那她們沒搭到飛機是自己活該吧.況且有出過國的人都知道要提早到機場因為check in和通關都要滿長的時間.
我實在想不出為何長榮要惡意遺棄她們?而且好像也只有熊團沒搭上飛機.
沒搭過長榮她的服務態度不予置評.

之前跟朋友去歐洲自助也是在那個機場搭長榮的飛機回來，因為是自己回去，而且又人生地不熟的，所以當天5點多就起床了，然後搭6點多的客運車去機場，到的時候以經是快八點了，當天我還下錯航站搭機在第二航站，我在第一航站下。
本來想說跟中正機場一樣走個路就到了，結果走到底沒有路了，還沒有看到，最後用破破的英文問人，才知道要搭公車。也著實折騰了快一個小時（坐車從第一航站到第二航站還要半個多小時），總算到了，也check了，才算比較安心。

我覺得在人生地不熟的地方，本來就要安排充裕一點的時間來應付一些額外的狀況，而且我覺得飛機本來就不等人的，自己來不及還振振有詞，看了就叫人不爽。

不爽的應該是搭上了飛機回台灣，但是行李確沒有一起回來的我吧。
問他們服務人員，每個都三不知，然後填單子叫我回去等，問他們這樣可不可以要求賠償，他們說要丟了才賠。＞＜ 結果過了快2個禮拜才送回來。
這點就讓我對於他們的服務品質打折扣了。

沒錯，小弟之前去上海
是從香港轉的，還記得是港龍航空，
一上飛機，機上完全沒有電視，所以也不可能提供相關飛航的資訊，
機上的東西又難喝，更難吃...
飛機飛的又不穩，那時侯真心情，真的是.@#!)&*@

這個是側風降落的標準情形啊
側風越大偏的角度越大
不用香港
台灣也可以看的到哦
尤其是那種有小型颱風但是沒有到達停止起降標準的時候....

側風很大時起飛也是這樣,飛機明明是向前飛,不過機頭卻是向著旁邊...