|
||
|
Advance Member
  
加入日期: Jan 2003
文章: 329
|
引用:
cavity search是這女的自己講的，根據美國官方的講法只有strip search沒有cavity search，國外媒體也都只報導strip search，雖然兩方的講法都有可能，不過我自己是比較傾向相信美國國務院，因為這女的犯法在先，又想搞特權，我個人認為比較可能說謊想搞大事件。 |
||||||||
2013-12-19, 03:28 PM
#71
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: May 2005
文章: 345
|
引用:
跟633頗雷同的一點，就是可能外交部有結構性的問題，所以當事人都覺得很委屈。 不幸的是，美國就是卯起來立法禁絕這類惡習。 Debate: Arrest, strip-search of Indian diplomat 'barbaric?' Counterpoint 2: Even if she did, the law is unfair, and many break it "According to Indian diplomats serving in Western countries, paying lesser than what is actually on official papers is a common practice among the Indian diplomats," IBN reports. "They claim that the salary fixed by the U.S. government is too high for the Indian diplomats." Varia of Human Rights Watch weighed in on that point. "No one has a right to a domestic worker. Yes, child care options in the U.S. need to be expanded. But if you cannot afford to pay your nanny, you shouldn't hire one." |
|||
|
2013-12-19, 03:46 PM
#72
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: May 2005
文章: 345
|
引用:
我對苛扣工錢非常反感，這點可能逆來順受的台勞不容易了解... |
|
|
2013-12-19, 04:42 PM
#73
|
|
