小六男童錢不少 「性交易所得」
http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NAT2/3719364.shtml

2007.02.07

NO,NO,NO這個錯的很嚴重,女對男哪來的進入
依照我國絕對公正的刑法,女對男絕對沒有強姦這回事

事實上根據男女的生理構造，「進入」的確很難成立

但是新法增加「使之接合」的目的就是針對女對男的****行為

有性侵.

爬到這個古文
我想說說我的看法
您說"至少我沒看過2個很嬌媚的女生是同性戀 "
那是因為您不知道吧
就我所知 很多同志朋友你無法從外觀區分
很多男同志不娘,很多女同志不陽剛
(這就是一般的刻板印象)
所以他/她ㄧ天不跟你說性向,你可能ㄧ輩子也不知道他們是同志

女的可以
男的無法接受....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...6060700830.html

Gay Marriage Amendment Fails in Senate

By Shailagh Murray
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, June 8, 2006; Page A01

A constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, backed by President Bush and conservative groups, was soundly defeated in the Senate yesterday after proponents failed to persuade a bare majority of all senators to support the measure.

Although most states have acted to prevent same-sex partners from marrying, seven Senate Republicans were wary of wading into the politically risky issue and voted against bringing the proposed amendment to a final vote.

Supporters went into yesterday's showdown knowing they could not muster the two-thirds majority needed to pass a constitutional amendment, much less the 60 votes needed to cut off debate and bring the measure to a final vote. But they had at least hoped to gain a simple majority of the Senate, or 51 votes. Instead, they fell short, 49 to 48.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (Tenn.) and other GOP leaders had sought the vote as a way to help galvanize their party's conservative base at a time of flagging public confidence in the Bush administration and Congress. Some conservatives sought to put a positive face on the outcome, noting that proposed constitutional amendments typically encounter an uphill battle.

"We're making progress, and we're not going to stop until marriage between a man and a woman is protected . . . protected in the courts, protected in the Constitution, but most of all, protected for the people and for the future of our children in this society," Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) said after the vote.

But Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who opposed the measure, said: "Most Americans are not yet convinced that their elected representatives or the judiciary are likely to expand decisively the definition of marriage to include same-sex couples."

Although conservative and liberal groups regard same-sex marriage as a litmus test, public opinion on the issue is less cut and dried. Recent polls show that most Americans oppose allowing gay men and lesbians to marry legally, but an ABC News poll released this week found that only 42 percent support a constitutional amendment to ban such unions.

A similar amendment failed 48 to 50 in the Senate in 2004. But earlier this week, Sen. Wayne Allard (R-Colo.), the measure's chief sponsor, said it was gaining momentum. Advocates noted that 45 states have approved constitutional amendments or statutes to define traditional marriage in a way that would bar same-sex marriage. Moreover, evangelical Christian organizations and some black and Hispanic groups, all representing key voting blocs in November, also have supported a ban.

But two of the Republicans who had supported the same-sex marriage ban in 2004, Senate Judiciary Chairman Arlen Specter (Pa.) and Sen. Judd Gregg (N.H.), voted against the amendment this time. After yesterday's roll call, Allard said: "We didn't get as many votes as we'd hoped." He added, "If it's up to me, we'll have a vote on this issue every year."

Gregg said in a statement that he had switched sides on the issue after becoming convinced that a Massachusetts Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage in that state would not bleed into other jurisdictions. "Fortunately, such legal pandemonium has not ensued," he said. "The past two years have shown that federalism, not more federal laws, is a viable and preferable approach."

The other Republicans who voted against the amendment are: Sens. Lincoln D. Chafee (R.I.); Susan Collins and Olympia J. Snowe, both of Maine; and John E. Sununu (N.H.). Two Democrats voted in favor: Sens. Robert C. Byrd (W.Va.) and Ben Nelson (Neb.).

Most Democrats decried the vote as election-year pandering. "This is pure politics," Sen. Russell Feingold (Wis.) said on the floor before the vote. "This amendment we are debating will not pass, but it still risks stoking fear and divisiveness at a time when we should be trying to unite Americans."

Some political analysts share that view, and wonder if the issue could undercut Republican efforts to woo another vital voting group in November: moderates, who may interpret the Senate effort as a worrisome federal overreach.

Issues such as same-sex marriage "can really hurt Republicans in the suburbs," said G. Terry Madonna, a political science professor and pollster at Franklin and Marshall College in Pennsylvania, a midterm battleground state where Democrats are trying to pick up a Senate seat and at least three GOP-held House seats.

The debate in the Senate this week attracted numerous prospective 2008 presidential candidates, including Feingold and McCain, who both opposed the amendment, and Frist and Brownback, who were strong supporters.

Explaining his opposition on the floor yesterday, McCain said that although he believes that expanding the definition of marriage may be "of questionable public value," he also believes that the debate "is currently and properly being resolved in different ways, in 50 different states."

Democrats mocked Republicans for squandering floor time that could be devoted to debating the Iraq war, high gasoline prices and rising health-care costs. "It's no surprise that the American people are frustrated with the Republican Senate these days," said Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.).

But GOP members defended the action. "During the course of the debate on this amendment, a lot of the opponents . . . continued to repeat the mantra that 'this is not something the American people care about,' " Sen. John Thune (S.D.) said. "The American people have their own way of deciding what's important to them and what they care about."

Thune noted that South Dakota is one of seven states that will have a measure to ban same-sex marriage on the ballot this fall, "and I predict that it will pass by a very large margin."

＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
請教一下
關於這則新聞，同志們的看法為何？

調局男學員染愛滋 被迫離開
http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NAT2/3749091.shtml

該名學員外表斯文，說話與肢體動作頗女性化，

軍中爆醜聞 排長性侵兩新兵 ..

http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NATS9/3902604.shtml



【聯合報╱記者盧德允／台北報導】 2007.06.26 02:59 am

軍中爆發同性性侵醜聞。後備司令部新兵訓練旅鍾姓中尉排長先後性侵兩名新兵，已遭軍法判處一年六個月徒刑，正在監執行。

據了解，被性侵的新兵因為有憂鬱症狀況，已移往國軍北投醫院接受心理輔導，雙雙停役。

去年十二月九日、十日，鍾姓排長以長官命令的方式，性侵一名新兵。直到今年二月，新兵受不了壓力，寫在作文中，整起案件才曝光。中區後備指揮部政戰主任孫振東表示，「幹部發現他的作文簿之後，立刻主動查證。」沒想到四月又有一名新兵跳出來檢舉，在去年也遭到鍾姓排長性侵。

鍾姓中尉係陸軍官校專科班畢業，在新訓旅擔任基層幹部。今年二月六日本案移送軍法偵辦後，鍾員即被調離帶兵職務，並予管束；五月廿四日由軍事法庭判處一年六個月徒刑同時撤職。軍法判處的是其中一名受害人的案子，另一名受害人的案子，正由軍事法院檢察署偵查中。

【2007/06/26 聯合報】