|
||
|
Golden Member
 加入日期: Oct 2001 您的住址: 秘密
文章: 2,604
|
敝人覺得明年將會是賽羊發揚光大的時候,只要intel推出這顆
http://www.intel.com/cd/products/se...sors/188968.htm 效能保證讚到爆,K8雙核恐怕都不是對手......L2 256MB   |
|||||||
2005-08-21, 06:31 PM
#31
|
|
|
Elite Member
  加入日期: May 2002
文章: 7,865
|
引用:
我笑了!~ |
|||
|
2005-08-21, 06:47 PM
#32
|
|
|
Power Member
加入日期: Jan 2004
文章: 607
|
引用:
...這個好 , 這個好......恐怕市面上的CPU皆難以匹敵 , 如果還要轉入.65製程 , 那就更妙啦....
__________________
-陰本陽生 陽本陰長- 小測 GA .7s748和Sempron2400+ (圖小多...) 小測 青雲 k8x890 pro2 (測測看k8t890晶片，圖小多) 小測 華擎 ~ 939S56-M (sis 756晶片組...) |
|
|
2005-08-21, 06:51 PM
#33
|
|
|
Major Member
加入日期: Dec 2004
文章: 261
|
引用:
哇哇~~L2 256M? INTEL 幹得好!!! 此文章於 2005-08-21 07:10 PM 被 skuruto 編輯. |
|
|
2005-08-21, 07:04 PM
#34
|
|
|
Master Member
加入日期: Feb 2002 您的住址: 楓葉與霜晶的華爾滋
文章: 1,862
|
賽羚羊還是屎您娘(台)
等到時候就知道了。爛的長管線架構不改，我想前景慘澹...
__________________
|
|
2005-08-21, 07:29 PM
#35
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Apr 2004 您的住址: 中華民國台灣台北
文章: 455
|
引用:
實在是居家旅行,搶市佔率,必備良藥! 真棒 L2 256MB 那...哪裡才買的到 |
|
|
2005-08-21, 10:03 PM
#36
|
|
|
Power Member
加入日期: Jul 2004 您的住址: 台北市
文章: 643
|
I SKIPPED ANY REPORT ABOUT INTEL DESKTOP CPU, I WILL WAIT TILL THE DAY THAT EVERYONE AGREED IT IS REALLY GOOD, SO MUCH TIME AND ENERGY WILL BE SAVED.
REMEMBER WHEN PRESCOTT L2=1M,WHAT HAPPEN TO PERFORMANCE? BUT HEAT WENT UP. |
|
2005-08-22, 07:59 AM
#37
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Sep 2004 您的住址: Chiayi
文章: 1,392
|
引用:
如果AMD的時脈及L2跟INTEL一樣....那P4只能跟Sempron比效能而己 |
|
|
2005-08-22, 08:18 AM
#38
|
|
|
Master Member
加入日期: Dec 2002 您的住址: Minas Faen
文章: 2,181
|
引用:
好悲壯阿...NetBurst 刺龍王.... 希望能夠刺深一點~~ 這樣對明年的消費者更有利 不然除了少數網站因為只測Sandra等等, Netburst老實說就只一攤只能一直努力加Cache的死水了 |
|
|
2005-08-22, 08:42 AM
#39
|
|
|
Power Member
加入日期: Jul 2004 您的住址: 台北市
文章: 643
|
Good bye NetBurst!
引用: "NetBurst architecture which was the key feature of Pentium 4 when it was introduced in 2000, is being phased out. " ----- "A very long pipeline turns out to be extremely inefficient," said Brookwood. "Therefore, although you felt good because you had a 3 GHz processor, in reality, it wasn't delivering any more performance than a 2 GHz processor with shorter pipelines. But it used a lot more power and generated a lot more heat." http://www.tomshardware.com/hardnew...822_173500.html 此文章於 2005-08-23 11:53 AM 被 MDD 編輯. |
|
2005-08-23, 11:49 AM
#40
|
|
