|
||
|
Senior Member
 
加入日期: Dec 2001
文章: 1,354
|
引用:
既然買了3000+不開Cool 'n' Quiet太可惜了? 我為了這功能還特地把能上300的sp2800+賣了耶 結果買來得3000+原廠空冷不加壓極限跟2800+一樣都在2.4G到2.5G間, 而且L2剩128k  但我覺得為了Cool 'n' Quiet值得啦 期待也能看到你開了Cool 'n' Quiet後的測試 此文章於 2005-08-20 09:08 PM 被 tosleep 編輯. |
||||||||
2005-08-20, 08:53 PM
#11
|
|
|
Major Member
加入日期: Jan 2002 您的住址: 台北
文章: 282
|
引用:
[email protected] 待機67W [email protected] 待機66W [email protected] 待機65W [email protected] 待機64W [email protected] 待機67W [email protected] 待機66W [email protected] 待機65W [email protected] 待機64W [email protected] 待機67W [email protected] 待機66W [email protected] 待機65W [email protected] 待機64W [email protected] 待機67W [email protected] 待機66W [email protected] 待機65W [email protected] 待機64W [email protected] 待機67W [email protected] 待機66W [email protected] 待機65W [email protected] 待機64W 這樣你應該明白了所以我不開Cool 'n' Quiet 也不用RightMark CPU Clock 降時脈,只降電壓 我覺得保持在高時脈整體效能比較好 此文章於 2005-08-20 09:30 PM 被 tsk 編輯. |
|||
|
2005-08-20, 09:24 PM
#12
|
|
|
Power Member
加入日期: Jul 2004 您的住址: 台北市
文章: 643
|
NEED FOR 低電壓 MOBILE CPU
1.152 v OC to 2G, it seems too good to be true. 1G someone did with 0.8v, my XP-M 2500+ need 1.45v for 2G,
K8 is really impressive. then the need for mobile Sempron is even less. 此文章於 2005-08-20 09:32 PM 被 MDD 編輯. |
|
2005-08-20, 09:28 PM
#13
|
|
|
Senior Member
加入日期: Dec 2001
文章: 1,354
|
引用:
好詭異,如果是這樣,那mobile的25W是怎麼達成的? 我如果在BIOS調整過電壓,進WINDOWS後Cool 'n' Quiet 調整電壓的功能就會失效 這個時候不管怎麼設定,雖然RightMark CPU Clock會顯示電壓有變化 但cpuid偵測出來的cpu電壓卻完全不會改變 例如在BIOS裡設1.45V,進WINDOWS後,RightMark CPU Clock會顯示降到1.1v, 但在CPU-Z裡偵測出來電壓卻會一直維持1.45V 會不會你也是這樣的情形? 此文章於 2005-08-20 11:08 PM 被 tosleep 編輯. |
|
|
2005-08-20, 10:13 PM
#14
|
|
|
Senior Member
加入日期: Dec 2001
文章: 1,354
|
引用:
桌上型的電壓下限是1.1v 即使調到0.8v,他還是跑1.1v 另一個K8的優點就是溫度了 待機下散熱片幾乎是涼的  |
|
|
2005-08-20, 10:17 PM
#15
|
|
|
Power Member
加入日期: Jul 2004 您的住址: 台北市
文章: 643
|
User Configurable Cool 'n' Quiet
引用:
that means you are using Cool 'n' Quiet, but with CrystalCPUID, you can go to lowest, CrystalCPUID: User Configurable Cool 'n' Quiet http://www.silentpcreview.com/article231-page2.html |
|
|
2005-08-20, 10:29 PM
#16
|
|
|
Senior Member
加入日期: Dec 2001
文章: 1,354
|
引用:
剛剛測試的結果仍然是無法低於1.1V 查了一下google發現外國論壇裡有人說這是e版的新限制 http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:...&client=firefox |
|
|
2005-08-20, 11:12 PM
#17
|
|
|
Major Member
加入日期: Jan 2002 您的住址: 台北
文章: 282
|
引用:
我跟你一樣,BIOS如果有設定電壓的話 就固定在那個電壓了,用什麼軟體都沒辦法調 我想這樣也蠻好的.. 這顆CPU搭配軟體的調整被限制在1.1V~1.45V 體質差想超的話就可以用BIOS設定到1.5V以上 |
|
|
2005-08-21, 05:50 AM
#18
|
|
|
Power Member
加入日期: Jul 2004 您的住址: 台北市
文章: 643
|
TEMP IS NOT AN ISSUE ANYMORE
引用:
惡魔印記666” 4400+關閉Cool'n quiet運轉好幾個小時,溫度只有36度(待機時27度)” http://forum.pcdvd.com.tw/showthrea...#post1077734272 HE HAD SIMILAR FINDING LIKE YOURS, SEEMS TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE, BUT IT SEEMS WITH E REVISION, TEMP IS NOT AN ISSUE ANYMORE. 此文章於 2005-08-21 06:58 AM 被 MDD 編輯. |
|
2005-08-21, 06:44 AM
#19
|
|
|
Advance Member
  加入日期: Nov 2001
文章: 439
|
引用:
這棵 .13製程 25w的版本,雖不支援 64bit,SSE3,不過低溫省電, 朋友的機子(SOLTEK 3801),8X200...1.08V就能正常動作, 4X200...0.75v都還能動,只是效能變差(耗電大概只剩12w~14w) 拿來當bt機的cpu..算還不錯!! |
|
|
2005-08-21, 11:22 AM
#20
|
|
