![]() |
||
Silent Member
加入日期: Oct 2013
文章: 5
|
回錯 自刪
![]() ![]() sorry |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
Silent Member
加入日期: Oct 2013
文章: 5
|
引用:
你要問他方圓百呎有沒有其他住家之前 是不是可以先拿出科學證明 抽的菸可以影響方圓百呎外的人? |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
New Member
加入日期: Jun 2015
文章: 1
|
引用:
來了.... 我一直覺得這個一點也不合理阿, 暴露在較小劑量的化學物質之下會產生更大的危害,請問來源是什麼, 有經過哪些的對照實驗, 還是只是來自禁菸的宣傳? Despite reports to the contrary, secondhand smoke is not worse than active smoking. The toxicology of tobacco smoke is the same irrespective of the method of exposure. The factors of dose, concentration, duration, and host susceptibility all contribute to the adverse health effects observed in an individual. So-called secondhand smoke produces adverse health effects in individuals compared with those not exposed to any form of tobacco smoke. This finding forms part of the medical basis of legislation to limit unwanted potential exposures to tobacco smoke in public venues. —R. Steven Tharratt, MD, MPVM (111-10) From the January 2008 Issue of Clinical Advisor » |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Regular Member
![]() ![]() 加入日期: Oct 2002 您的住址: H.C
文章: 91
|
不知道該說什麼?依照樓主這個理念應該比較適合獨自去深山修身養性,一個人不能融入形形色色的社會時,應該需要自我調適一下,一昧的排他只會讓你越來越孤獨.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Junior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Dec 2003 您的住址: Earth
文章: 916
|
話說...也很久沒見到台啤大了~~~
呃...留下的同學請繼續。 ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |