據日本《東京新聞》20日報道，有關2016年至2018年的聯合國經常預算和維和行動預算分攤比例談判接近尾聲。據估算，中國在維和預算中的分攤比例將超過日本，上升至第2位。日媒擔憂，這會導致日本在聯合國的存在感下降，影響其「入常」的目標。

共同社稱，聯合國預算分攤比例計劃於今年年末確定。據估算，2016年的維和預算分攤比例前3位是美國、中國和日本。美國佔28.57%，中國從此前的第6位（6.64%）躍至第2位，佔10.29%，而日本從10.83%下降至9.68%，從第2位跌至第3位。

在聯合國經常預算當中，日本的「存在感」也在下降，分攤比例自1983年以來首次跌破10%。據估算，美國以22%的分攤比例在經常預算中居首位，其次是佔9.68%的日本和佔7.92%的中國。日本在2013年至2015年的預算分攤比例為10.83%，而中國此前為5.15%。

《東京新聞》稱，日本常駐聯合國代表吉川元偉表示，此次分攤比例下降將對日本外交產生影響，同時他還指出：「（各方）分攤的費用是支持組織運行的有如汽油之於發動機般的存在。（在分攤比例排名下降的情況下）仍不讓日本喪失存在感與發言權是我們的任務。」

共同社報道稱，經常預算的分攤比例根據各國國民總收入等經濟指標計算得出。發達國家所佔比例較高，發展中國家則相對較低。2016年至2017年的預算規模約為55億美元。維和預算分攤比例基於經常預算分攤比例確定。

據俄羅斯衛星網消息，俄羅斯戰略與技術分析中心專家卡申透露，因受歐洲制裁，俄羅斯新款「暴徒」級護衛艦，將要安裝的不是德國而是中國的柴油發動機。

此前，俄羅斯為白嘴鴉雛級快艇采購的也是中國柴油發動機。

同時，俄羅斯還希望中國提供微電子元件。

三菱MRJ主翼強度不足 交付時間推遲一年

【共同社12月24日電】三菱飛機公司（愛知縣豐山町）24日宣佈，把研發中的日本首款噴氣式支線客機MRJ（三菱支線客機)的首架交付時間推遲1年左右。三菱飛機發現MRJ的主翼強度不足，需要時間進行改造和試驗。三菱飛機原計劃於2017年46月向ANA（全日空）控股公司交付首架MRJ，現在看來交付時間要推遲至2018年下半年。

這是MRJ的研發計劃第6次延期，交付計劃第4次延期。今年11月11日MRJ首次試飛取得成功後，三菱飛機曾希望向海外的推銷能由此取得進展。接連出現的計劃延期有可能給營銷工作帶來負面影響。

三菱飛機的社長森本浩通當天在愛知縣春日井市會見了記者。一同出席記者會的副社長岸信夫透露，MRJ的主翼強度不足，無法獲得國土交通省關於機體安全性的“型號認證”。他表示MRJ進行試飛沒有問題，但“當初的設想有過於樂觀之處”。

森本表示：“為了使機體能有更高的完成度，將對試驗項目進行增加、修改。”他還透露正在對與發動機有關的軟件進行改良。因機體改造而中斷的試飛將於明年1月下半月恢復。

原定明年春季開始在美國進行的試飛推遲至明年下半年。總計需要2500小時的試飛時間和到2020年每月生產10架MRJ的量產計劃將維持不變。

ANA和日本航空等國內外航空公司共訂購了407架MRJ。MRJ迄今進行了3次試飛。根據對試飛數據的分析並參考美國技術人員的意見，三菱飛機認為有必要對研發計劃做出整體上的修改。




日本MRJ和中國ARJ21開始研發的時間差不多

現在中國ARJ21已經投入商業運營了 MRJ還在拖

而且MRJ的售價達4730萬美元

比3000萬美元的ARJ21貴太多了

這樣還有市場競爭力

一個是還沒飛上天就有400以上的單
一個是靠一堆國企才勉強多少...

到底誰才沒市場競爭力？

俄日怎麼不聯手開發新飛機

雙方都缺乏一些特色工業

借用一下MDC討論區某網友的發言：
http://www.acewings.com/cobrachen/f...252&whichpage=2

麻煩自行比較一下兩者的時程.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_Regional_Jet
Mitsubishi Regional Jet

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comac_ARJ21
Comac ARJ21

兩者根本無法相提並論.
ARJ是2002年啟動,MRJ是2007年看到模型.就算不看這個.
ARJ是2007年完成第一架原型,2008年首航.
MRJ是2014年完成第一架原型,2015年首航.
ARJ剛剛在2015年交付,MRJ在2018年交付.

怎麼算都是ARJ時間要長得多,而且還沒拿到FAA認證.
................剩下我就不引了。

您來搞笑是吧?
一個是還沒上天就已經被訂了四百多架
一個是到目前為止訂三百多架 , 九成是賣給中國國內航空 , 剩下一成就是什麼剛果寮國那種阿薩布魯國家
結果現在竟還有人操這個心去問人家的飛機有沒比ARJ21這種連獲得歐洲航空安全局（EASA）與美國聯邦航空管理局（FAA）的認證都沒有
只能關起門來自爽或是賣給第三世界那些阿薩布魯國家的飛機更有市場競爭力?
最後不用笑哪個
ARJ21最初預定2007年交付 , 之後二度延期拖到2013 , 真正載客首航據說要等到2016
怎看都是你比人家更能拖

Possible J-16 EW variant makes its first flight

http://www.janes.com/article/56855/...ts-first-flight



A new electronic warfare variant of the SAC J-16 reportedly first flew on 18 December 2015.


A possible new electronic warfare (EW) variant of the Shenyang Aircraft Corporation (SAC) J-16 twin-seat strike fighter made its first flight on 18 December, according to Chinese sources, potentially adding a significant offensive capability to the People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF).

Images of the new variant have emerged on several Chinese military web pages, including a 21 December 2015 video report on the popular Ifeng web page. The most salient modifications are two new wingtip pods similar to the Northrop Grumman AN/ALQ-218 Tactical Jamming Receiver, leading to comparisons with the E/A-18G Growler electronic attack variant of Boeing's Super Hornet.

This possible J-16 EW prototype appears to lack the usual fuselage-mounted gun and the infrared search and tracking system (IRST) also appears to be missing, but the J-16, which resembles the Russian Sukhoi Su-30, would have up to 10 wing and fuselage hardpoints for ordnance and active jamming pods.


A close-up of the new electronic warfare pod on the wingtips of the SAC J-16 shows a similarity to the Northrop Grumman AN/ALQ-218 Tactical Jamming Receiver.

The PLA is known to have developed three tactical electronic warfare pods. The first, similar in size to the EDO Corporation AN/ALQ-99, may come in receiver and transmitter versions and was first seen on Xian Aircraft Corporation JH-7 strike fighters in 2007. A smaller KG600 pod also equips JH-7s, while the KG300 appears to be an export variant.

An EW version of the J-16 equipped similarly to the E/A-18G would give PLAAF strike packages a far greater chance of reaching their targets and avoiding increasingly capable air defences.

Development of a J-16 EW variant could also lead to a similar carrier warfare version of the twin-seat J-15S.

Chinese commentators note that, just as the Growler enables US air forces, an active jamming version of the J-16 would allow the PLAAF to decrease its dependence on large and vulnerable electronic support aircraft based on the Shaanxi Y-8 airframe.

While in early 2014 an Asian government source estimated that 100 J-16s would be in PLA service by 2020, the emergence of an EW version could increase that number.

China advances sea- and land-based nuclear deterrent capabilities

http://www.janes.com/article/56667/...nt-capabilities


A rare frontal view of the new CASC DF-41 ICBM

China has advanced its nuclear deterrent capabilities by sending a Type 094 ('Jin'-class) nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) out on its first deterrent patrol and by conducting a fifth reported test of its mobile, solid-fuel, multiple independently targetable re-entry vehicle (MIRV)-capable DF-41 intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), according to US officials.

Although China's first second-generation Type 094 was launched in 2004, according to IHS Jane's Fighting Ships , US officials have not acknowledged that its premier deterrent patrol had occurred until this month.

"Given China's known capabilities and their efforts to develop a sea-based deterrent, in absence of indicators to the contrary it is prudent to assume that patrols are occurring," said US Strategic Command spokesperson US Navy captain Pamela Kunzein in a statement to The Washington Times published on 10 December.

The People's Liberation Army Navy's (PLAN's) preparations for deterrent patrols, however, have been lengthy. The Pentagon's 2014 annual report to the US Congress on China's Military Power had stated: "China is likely to conduct its first nuclear deterrence patrols with the JIN-class SSBN in 2014." Since at least 2008 Chinese internet imagery has shown the Type 094 based at the new large PLAN base at Yalong Bay on Hainan Island.

Recent satellite images have shown three Type 094s at Yalong Bay. The Pentagon's China report said in its 2015 edition that four Jin-class SSBNs are currently operational and for several years has stated up to five may be built. However, in Congressional testimony on 15 April the previous US Pacific Command commander, Admiral Samuel Locklear, said China might build up to eight Type 094s.

The Type 094 SSBN is armed with 12 7,000-8,000 km range JL-2 submarine-launched ballistic missiles armed with single nuclear warheads.

China's land-based nuclear forces also advanced with a 4 December test of the road-mobile DF-41 ICBM employing two warheads, according to US sources reported on 11 December in the Washington Free Beacon .