![]() |
||
*停權中*
加入日期: Jul 2003
文章: 204
|
史上最大災難來襲,半個北美洲瞬間被夷為平地!
數以百計的彗星群撞上地球,世界末日即將來臨,每顆彗星的體積猶如一個小島,能量等同於一千枚核子彈威力,美國科學家束手無策,地球六十億人口只能坐以待斃,沒有像布魯斯威利般的英雄能夠上到彗星進行引爆,不只自由女神像、五角大廈將被摧毀,美國首當其衝身先士卒,足足有半個北美洲最終被夷為平地,創下災難片影史重創美國本土最嚴重紀錄,這是2008年最新災難片【2008隕石噩夢】的情節,但這不是危言聳聽而已,本片的拍攝獲得了美國探索頻道(Discovery Channel)的專業背書,在全美發行本片,向全球人民提出了這樣的警告:彗星撞地球不只是電影情節而已,而是地球隨時可能面臨的災難。
【2008隕石噩夢】以研究史上著名的「通古斯卡神祕爆炸」事件為緣起,精準預測出了地球即將面臨的更大災難。通古斯卡事件發生在西元1908年6月30日清晨,西伯利亞森林地帶的遊牧人群,被一陣巨大而強烈的爆炸聲驚醒,他們看到東方的天空中,出現了一個比太陽還要亮而高速「飛行」的物體,在一陣大爆炸後,一個恐怖而巨大的蕈狀雲平地而起,在現場的無論是人或動物,都因隨著大火球吹過來的熱風而發出淒慘的哀痛聲,在四處隨意狂奔之後倒地而亡。當時世界各地的地震儀,指針都不停地晃動,整個西伯利亞的天空都染成詭異的粉紅色!直到後來首批蘇聯調查人員進入現場後,才發現了一個驚奇的景象 - 整整兩千平方公里內巨大的樹木都被徹底掃平了! 是什麼原因造成這次驚人而恐怖的爆炸?最早認為是一顆巨大的隕石墜落,但地質學加遍查各地,都沒有發現任何隕石坑及隕石碎裂的破片殘粒。因此有科學家認為可能是一顆冰凍的彗星,當其進入地球大氣層後,因高溫爆炸而整個蒸發掉了,以致於沒有任何遺跡留下。 在面對【2008隕石噩夢】的來襲時,科學家同樣也產生了意見分歧,電影中一派學者認為可發射核彈將殞石撞擊偏離地球的路線,一派學者則提出「通古斯卡事件」為反例,表示慧星乃冰塊等液態組成,無法將之炸離軌道,只會被炸碎而已,而破碎的彗星群將對地球帶來更致命的流彈狀衝擊,因此【2008隕石噩夢】的前提是:無論如何彗星勢必將撞擊到地球表面,對地球環境造成嚴重衝擊! 【2008隕石噩夢】可以說是近年來災難片當中的異數,沒有金剛不壞之身的英雄來拯救地球,沒有粉飾太平的樂觀想法,反而是用最積極正面的方式來面對災難,進行災難的沙盤推演,提供緊急應變措施及備案,不惜完成諾亞方舟式的疏散難民計畫等,畢竟事先的防範永遠比事後的補救來的重要,即將在本週末4/11全台上映的【2008隕石噩夢】就像先替全人類打一劑預防針般受用,但願這部電影的情節在你我有生之年都不會真的遇到! |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Feb 2008
文章: 206
|
這應該是新聞稿 (所以我不是在說樓主).
一整個在耗洨................ ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Aug 2006
文章: 347
|
電影本來就是在耗洨
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Advance Member
![]() ![]() 加入日期: Mar 2005
文章: 424
|
星期五就要上映了...我現在才知道有這片
![]() 是這片太低調了還是我消息不靈通....
__________________
impossible is nothing 「沒有什麼事情是不可能的...只是有些事情發生的機率比較低罷了」 機率遊戲 |
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Jan 2008
文章: 5
|
電視單元影集也能拿來上院線
太恐怖了, 果然是噩夢 |
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Dec 2001
文章: 1,438
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Jul 2003
文章: 204
|
那篇是我看完試片自己寫的
電影是真的不錯看! 不要被一些毛頭小鬼看完盜版說的給左右 即使是電視電影也是Discovery頻道出品高水準的電影 至於IMDB裡下面影評也是有給九顆星好評的 而且論述最完整 Why I liked this movie..., 14 March 2008 Author: crachil from Beijing, China To date, 20% of people who voted on this movie gave it a 9 or a 10. I was one of them, and I would like to elaborate on the reasons why: (1) The movie attempts to be realistic. The scenario it describes, broadly, is not impossible. Tomorrow might be the day we learn about "Ireland-type" impact as shown in the movie (I am not an expert on this, but my understanding is that it is true that sufficiently small objects can be detected only too late for any action to be taken). I like that there are no super heroes in this movie and no futuristic technology (although the timing might be off on some elements of the story). On other hand, as other comments mention, there appear to be many goofs, some of which are quite embarrassing; and the more technical one goes, probably, the more one finds. For myself, only a moderately critical viewer, however, this did not create mental blocks to enjoying the film. (2) The movie underlines the importance of the development of technology and investment in outerspace / NEO exploration. In a scenario like this, no data is excessive and no technical capability of humanity is wasteful. From my very subjective perspective, space exploration is one direction of human effort that is bound to pay off in one way or another (and the movie highlights just one of the ways). My hope is that publicity to the topic and the field will create greater awareness of this in general public and will bring in more converts. (3) The movie highlights the "higher self" of the United States, as a country, nation, and culture - the notion that a nation can sacrifice itself for the good of the humanity. From a sarcastic perspective, I guess, this can be the most unrealistic part about the movie, but I, personally, don't adhere to this. More than that, I think that most nations and people would do the same if given a chance. In a way, the movie highlights the "higher self" of humanity, which we tend to loose sight of in daily life. Personally, this was the inspiring part about the movie. I bought this movie at an impulse and later, at home, was very disappointed to find out that it had under 5 average rating on IMDb. I almost did not watch the movie to not waste the time. I did eventually, on a mood upswing, and am very glad I did - it resonated with me. I hope some other people will enjoy it too! |
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Dec 2001
文章: 1,438
|
既然樓主都這麼說,似乎值得一看。
畢竟太冷門了,有種地雷片的感覺。 |
![]() |
![]() |
Junior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Jun 2003
文章: 708
|
昨天拿到兩張好像是首映會的票
還在考慮要不要去看說 看來值得一看 ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Feb 2008
文章: 206
|
澄清幾個科學概念.
像造成恐龍滅絕的那種等級的大撞擊. 要換算成核子彈. 單位是要用 "百萬枚". 核子彈有大顆小顆. 換算起來至少總要個幾千萬枚吧. 而那種等級的撞擊. 也不可能把半個北美洲撞掉. 那找一個更大顆的? 編劇也算有點天文常識. 知道不可能隨隨便便就有這麼大的星體掉落. 事實上 在內行星帶. 超過100km的小行星也沒幾顆. 在哈伯帶 這麼大的星體要掉到地球. 光是這個過程 可能就是幾百萬年. 所以. 為了達到"撞到半個北美洲"的效果. 就搞了什麼"彗星群". 目前壓根沒發現這種東西過. 不過 也沒人敢說不存在就是了.....這也是他敢用的原因. 反正 一整個在浩洨啦................ ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |