![]() |
||
|
Advance Member
![]() ![]() 加入日期: Jul 2001 您的住址: 台灣島
文章: 350
|
KT266A 主機板大評比...
http://anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.html?i=1578
幾乎已經涵蓋目前所有的 KT266A主機板 Editors Choice 金牌: Shuttle AK35GTR 銀牌: EPoX EP-8KHA+, 銅牌: ABIT KR7-RAID 偉格連邊都摸不上, 我一直覺得 Anandtech 與 Tomshardware 有點對立.
__________________
I Unknown...
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Major Member
![]() 加入日期: Dec 2001 您的住址: Tainan
文章: 184
|
Re: KT266A 主機板大評比...
引用:
更正一下: 榮獲『金牌』者是 ABIT KR7A RAID,非 SHUTTLE AK35GTR 榮獲『銀牌』者是 EPoX EP-8KHA+【正確的!】 榮獲『銅牌』者是 SHUTTLE AK35GTR,非 ABIT KR7A RAID 另外,http://www.overclockers.co.nz/ocnz/mobo/ddrmbshoot/f1.shtml 也有。推薦: ABIT KR7A RAID 為 OCNZ's top pick for DDR motherboards. It offers speed, feature and stability. Tweakers, this is the board to get ... the highest stability among the tests boards. IWILL XP333R 為 very close on top of the recommended list ... bit cheaper than Abit ... if you can find V2.1 of XP333 then it would be a good choice as well. I can not "officially" give Iwill the recommendation because of the revision mess as indicated here. EPOX 8KHA+ 為 would be a very good choice for anyone who is on a tight budget ... its performance is near the top of the crowd. Simply put, 8KHA+ offers the best performance/price ratio. 有關 Soltek 75DRV2 他們的評論如下: ... all boards perform identically except 75DRV2. After some investigation, we found out the board is operating at 134.32 MHz as indicated here, instead of 133.33 MHz. This may have helped Soltek to gain an edge at default setting. This kind of trick is being played by manufacturers to make their boards look better in benchmarks. 此文章於 2002-01-20 10:04 AM 被 Clairvoyant 編輯. |
|||
|
|
|
Major Member
![]() 加入日期: Dec 2001 您的住址: Tainan
文章: 184
|
Tom's Hardware 已 up-date 他們的 Mega Test 了
從 13 張 KT266A 主機版改為 14 張 KT266A 主機版 增加 Abit KR7A-RAID 那一張 對 Gigabyte 7VTX-H 部份有些補充 贏家依然是 75DRV2, Dragon+ 但另加新贏家 KR7A-RAID PF: 可惜沒有將 IWILL XP333R 及 SHUTTLE AK35GTR 列入 另外 在 AMD 3D 評論 DRV4 時 發展有關 Tom's Hardware - DRV2 評價的看法 : Both mainboards would run without any problems at 150fsb (note the DRV2 and 3Dmark2000), I was hoping for at least 160mhz from either product. I was happy to see that the DRV4 did not show the same reluctance to run at lower multiplyer ratios exhibited by the DRV2. Lowering the ratio on the DRV4 however did not help as the DRV4 refused to run stable at any speed above 150fsb. The ram used has been tested beyond 166mhz, memory timings were lowered and voltages increased to 2.7v, but 150 remained the limit. Seeing Epox's 8KHA+ running at much higher speeds is a little discouraging, and I really wonder how tomshardware described the DRV2 as the 'overclocking king'. If these 2 samples are anything to go by, then the status of overclocking king is somewhat exaggerated or misplaced. 不知各位大大又有何看法呢 此文章於 2002-01-21 09:58 AM 被 Clairvoyant 編輯. |
|
|
|
New Member
加入日期: Jan 2002
文章: 8
|
原來如此
__________________
Return to Castle Wolfenstein
|
|
|
|
Basic Member
加入日期: Jan 2002
文章: 15
|
我覺得偉格的SL-75DRV2 / SL-75DRV4
應該是稱作 " 效能之王" 吧~ 他的效能絕佳, 但是可超性並不很高.
__________________
![]() 家有賤狗 |
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Oct 2001
文章: 2,765
|
引用:
所以要玩超頻的就選8kha+吧....但是如果要求穩定&效能的話偉格是不錯滴... |
|
|
|