|
||
|
Basic Member
加入日期: Dec 2003
文章: 23
|
請問Ti4200大約和FX哪一系列同等級呢?
我已經有一張Ti4200
最近在考慮要不要換X800 各位大大能不能幫我決定呢? 謝謝 |
|||||||
2004-07-14, 12:38 PM
#1
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Feb 2004 您的住址: 桃園八德
文章: 1,067
|
X800跟TI 4200完全沒得比吧！
有錢的話，就買下去啦！ TI 4200比FX 5200 5600 5700都還好呀(在DX8的情形下！) |
||
|
2004-07-14, 01:13 PM
#2
|
|
|
Master Member
  
加入日期: Feb 2004 您的住址: 加拿大
文章: 2,391
|
回覆: 請問Ti4200大約和FX哪一系列同等級呢?
引用:
直接換X800吧... TI-4200大約在 5600~5700U的範圍裡
__________________
Rule #12: Never date a co-worker. Rule #13: Never involve lawyers. Rule #23: Never mess with a Marine's coffee if you want to live! Rule #51: Sometimes you are wrong 純白の吸血鬼は微笑む：私を殺した責任、とってもらうからわ - アルクエイド ブリュンスッド 貴方に出逢い STAR輝いて アタシが生まれて Was aus Liebe gethan wird, geschieht immer Jenseits von Gut und Böse - Friedrick Wilhelm Nietzsche Cain was the first man ever to strike down another... and when the Lord came to him and said ‘What have you done!?’, Cain could not hide his crime. For the voice of his brother’s blood cried out from the very ground The world has been your battlefield, everywhere you go. The blood of brothers and sons screams out against you. Perhaps you cannot yet hear it, because the soil is not your own, but you will... you will |
|
|
2004-07-14, 02:22 PM
#3
|
|
|
Advance Member
加入日期: Jun 2004 您的住址: 中市北區
文章: 498
|
回覆: 回覆: 請問Ti4200大約和FX哪一系列同等級呢?
引用:
換X800+1... 話說PCDVD果真是個敗家的好地方啊... 人人都會猛推高檔配備... 都是上了PCDVD才將我用了3年的P3-866升級的啊~~~ |
|
|
2004-07-15, 06:56 PM
#4
|
|
|
Junior Member
加入日期: Aug 2001 您的住址: 台北<-->台中
文章: 759
|
那請問一下Ti200跟現在的FX多少是差不多的呢?
謝謝~~~ |
|
2004-07-21, 08:45 AM
#5
|
|
|
Junior Member
加入日期: Aug 2001 您的住址: 台北<-->台中
文章: 759
|
引用:
沒有人會耶~~~ 自己堆一下~~~ 哪個好心人幫忙一下啦~~~ |
|
|
2004-07-30, 03:03 PM
#6
|
|
|
Elite Member
加入日期: Oct 2002 您的住址: Coruscant
文章: 4,466
|
我猜跟5200差不多吧
__________________
|
|
2004-07-30, 03:43 PM
#7
|
|
|
New Member
加入日期: Jan 2004 您的住址: Taipei
文章: 4
|
DX8比 5200快, 略低於 5600, 約只有 5900的40%吧
不過不支援DX9 |
|
2004-07-30, 04:02 PM
#8
|
|
|
Power Member
 加入日期: Jun 2004 您的住址: 土星
文章: 546
|
引用:
TI200比5200.5600.5700的64BIT卡都還要快 若要比128BIT的卡大約等於5200ULTRA或正5600左右 |
|
|
2004-07-30, 04:09 PM
#9
|
|
