|
||
|
Major Member
 加入日期: Mar 2002 您的住址: 美國WV(西維吉尼亞州)
文章: 281
|
請問 USB2.0 or IEEE1395 外接 HD 的容量限制...
各位網友:
想請問一下,是否 USB2.0 以及 IEEE 1394如果外接 HD 均會有128GB的容量限制嗎? 還是只有USB2.0 or IEEE 1394 其中一種才有呢? 謝謝!! |
|||||||
2003-02-26, 11:44 PM
#1
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Nov 2000
文章: 1,794
|
應該要看
1. BIOS 是否有支援到這麼大的容量 不過新出的版子應該都有支援超過 128G 2.1394 or USB2.0 晶片的限制 看看他們是否有GB 數的限制... |
||
|
2003-02-27, 12:36 AM
#2
|
|
|
Major Member
加入日期: May 2001 您的住址: Taiwan
文章: 244
|
See:
http://www.wiebetech.com/ATA6firewire.htm “Utilizing High Capacity ATA-6 (>137GB) Drives in FireWire Enclosures” by James Wiebe, CEO WiebeTech LLC October 21, 2002 www.wiebetech.com © 2002 WiebeTech LLC. All rights reserved. The OXFW911 was designed to support ATA-5 (but not ATA-6) devices, which, by definition, are less than 137GB in capacity. Western Digital started shipping drives with capacities of 180 and 200GB, and it became obvious that OXFW911's didn't work (especially with the 200GB version). These new drives were true ATA-6 devices, and the OXFW911 did not 'speak' true ATA-6 protocol. Most OXFW911 designs currently shipping are not capable of providing ATA-6 support (unless the vendor specifically provides and supports an upgrade program). The OXFW911, when modified with ATA-6 support, remains the preferred solution for FireWire drives. |
|
2003-02-27, 01:54 AM
#3
|
|
