PCDVD數位科技討論區
PCDVD數位科技討論區   註冊 常見問題 標記討論區為已讀

回到   PCDVD數位科技討論區 > 其他群組 > 七嘴八舌異言堂
帳戶
密碼
 

  回應
 
主題工具
ALPHONSE2501
Major Member
 
ALPHONSE2501的大頭照
 

加入日期: Jul 2005
您的住址: 加利福尼亞共和國
文章: 158
美國國務院13日記者會紀錄

此處為英文時間, 不喜者可請忽略

摘錄自國務院網站

我摘錄關於記者與發言人問答

引用:

QUESTION: In Taiwan, because we were --

MS. PSAKI: Just one moment. Is there any more on Pakistan or are we – okay.

QUESTION: Because we were told that the Taiwanese Government already contacted the U.S. Government regarding their ultimatum to the Philippine Government. I wonder, is there any comments from this state.

MS. PSAKI: Absolutely, and thank you for your question. We regret the tragic death of a Taiwan fishing boat master during a May 9th confrontation at sea with a Philippine patrol vessel. To answer your question, the United States has been in touch with both the Philippine Government and the Taiwan authorities regarding this incident and we welcome the Philippine Government’s pledge to conduct a full and transparent investigation into the incident.

QUESTION: And so far the Philippine Government hasn’t apologized, as we understand it. The Taiwanese Government become very tough on this issue and send the coast guard and even a military ship. So what’s U.S. position on this?

MS. PSAKI: Well, I think I’ve just stated it. We’ve been in touch with both the Taiwan authorities as well as the Philippine Government. We note that the Philippine Government has pledged to conduct a full and transparent investigation and to work with the Taiwan authorities to establish what has transpired.

QUESTION: So does U.S. worry about escalation when the military present or you support this kind of action?

MS. PSAKI: Well, we continue to urge all parties in any scenario to ensure maritime safety and to refrain from provocative actions. In this case, again, the Philippine Government is going to be conducting an investigation and they will be working with the Taiwan authorities to establish what happened in this case.

QUESTION: Follow up here?

QUESTION: (Inaudible) who take the provocative action first. The result is Philippine firing at the boat. So do you think – you think the bullet or firing on the boat is a right way here to solve the problem?
MS. PSAKI: Well, we, again, regret the tragic death of this Taiwan fishing boat, of this fishing boat master. We’re going to let – there is an investigation that will be underway, and we’ll let that proceed.

QUESTION: But isn’t this against the – you are calling for this South China Sea conduct. Do you agree the brutal way to solve the problem?
MS. PSAKI: We encourage both sides to refrain from provocative actions. I don’t think I have anything further to parse in this case.

QUESTION: What is the alleged provocation on the Taiwanese side in this case? I don’t – one side shot the other side, right? So if I shoot you, would you want the government to warn both of us not to shoot each other?

MS. PSAKI: I hope you don’t. (Laughter.)

QUESTION: When you are warning both sides, you’re giving equivalency. What is the Taiwanese action that you’re concerned about?

MS. PSAKI: Well, again, the government – the Philippine Government is looking into this case. I don’t want to get ahead of their process of investigating what happened.

QUESTION: The Taiwanese fisherman was unarmed. It’s a fishing boat, small compared to the government vessel that the Filipinos had. When you say confrontation, only one side was shooting the other, using machine gun. And as a matter of fact, 59 bullet holes were found on that small boat. So when you – your statement sounds like you were condoning the use of force by one side --

MS. PSAKI: I think I said we regret the tragic death of this individual. That’s how I started.

QUESTION: Well, I know. I want you to comment on the fact that someone opened fire, okay, in the South China Sea. I think the – as far as I can remember, the standard U.S. policy would call for peaceful resolution of any dispute. But in this particular incident, one side was using machine gun to speak. Would you say something to that effect, please?

MS. PSAKI: I think I’ve touched on everything I can touch on in this case at this stage. We, of course, do encourage peaceful negotiation. We encourage both sides – I wasn’t trying to attribute it to one side or the other, just making a broad point – to refrain from provocative actions. There’ll be an investigation into this case, and we’ll follow that closely.

QUESTION: Do you condone at all firing of firearms against unarmed civilians in the South China Sea?

MS. PSAKI: Again, I’m not going to speculate on this specific case. I appreciate all of the questions on it.

QUESTION: Just one more. Regarding the water, last Friday I asked about this. This incident took place in the water both sides claim as their EEZ. What is the U.S. stance on this? Is this water Philippine water or Taiwanese water or disputed waters?


問答因為凱瑞突然插入而在這裡中斷
因為國務院還沒有上傳當日錄影故原因不明
     
      
__________________
舊 2013-05-14, 12:21 PM #1
回應時引用此文章
ALPHONSE2501離線中  
teraflare
Senior Member
 
teraflare的大頭照
 

加入日期: Sep 2006
文章: 1,092


米國和菲律賓應該都知道

****在南海都是互相禮讓的吧...

菲律賓對自己中部南部都管不好了...

也別寄望他們的政府有什麼效率去管理 槍隻蛋泡泛亂的菲國

打自己國家治安差打死多少菲國人 我們不是很CARE.....

想打一中政策 造成台灣朝野分立的算盤

恐怕這次真的要偷雞不著蝕把米了

我覺得 因人制事 這種蠻幫治安混亂之國

唯有以武恫嚇 來保住平安

US擔心中共趁隙進南海?? 連摑個[小弟]的臉都不...做做樣子

看來 .....follow up
 
舊 2013-05-14, 12:30 PM #2
回應時引用此文章
teraflare離線中  
夢斷紅樓
Basic Member
 
夢斷紅樓的大頭照
 

加入日期: Aug 2006
文章: 21
記者繞來繞去 人家答來答去其實都只有一句話
__________________
redchamberdream, 紅樓夢, HolyCow
舊 2013-05-14, 12:31 PM #3
回應時引用此文章
夢斷紅樓離線中  
Million
*停權中*
 
Million的大頭照
 

加入日期: Mar 2012
文章: 382
感覺台灣跟菲律賓像是美國轄下的二個獨立State
舊 2013-05-14, 12:34 PM #4
回應時引用此文章
Million離線中  
yaowenchang
Advance Member
 

加入日期: Sep 2001
文章: 318
引用:
作者Million
感覺台灣跟菲律賓像是美國轄下的二個獨立State

不就老大手下的兩條狗?
舊 2013-05-14, 12:41 PM #5
回應時引用此文章
yaowenchang離線中  
hba1c
Advance Member
 

加入日期: Mar 2008
文章: 310
記者緊咬重點, 但Psaki狂打太極.
舊 2013-05-14, 12:44 PM #6
回應時引用此文章
hba1c離線中  
cys070
Elite Member
 
cys070的大頭照
 

加入日期: Aug 2003
文章: 10,511
保護費沒少給老鎂

連做做樣子教訓一下另一個小弟都不肯
舊 2013-05-14, 12:44 PM #7
回應時引用此文章
cys070離線中  
Million
*停權中*
 
Million的大頭照
 

加入日期: Mar 2012
文章: 382
引用:
作者yaowenchang
不就老大手下的兩條狗?

你這是中國觀點,也是中國為什麼強不起來的主因之一
舊 2013-05-14, 12:47 PM #8
回應時引用此文章
Million離線中  
Million
*停權中*
 
Million的大頭照
 

加入日期: Mar 2012
文章: 382
引用:
作者cys070
保護費沒少給老鎂

連做做樣子教訓一下另一個小弟都不肯

老美最近好像有在靠夭說台灣募兵制排擠到給他的保護費了
舊 2013-05-14, 12:49 PM #9
回應時引用此文章
Million離線中  
cys070
Elite Member
 
cys070的大頭照
 

加入日期: Aug 2003
文章: 10,511
引用:
作者Million
老美最近好像有在靠夭說台灣募兵制排擠到給他的保護費了


以前給的應該也夠讓老鎂打賓弟1巴掌

這都不肯做,只能說給多少都一樣

還是靠我們自己
舊 2013-05-14, 12:52 PM #10
回應時引用此文章
cys070離線中  


    回應


POPIN
主題工具

發表文章規則
不可以發起新主題
不可以回應主題
不可以上傳附加檔案
不可以編輯您的文章

vB 代碼打開
[IMG]代碼打開
HTML代碼關閉



所有的時間均為GMT +8。 現在的時間是12:26 PM.


vBulletin Version 3.0.1
powered_by_vbulletin 2025。