|
||
|
New Member
加入日期: Oct 2004
文章: 8
|
請教這是正常的DVR-109表現嗎?
剛買PIONEER DVR-09 (FIRMWARE 1.40), 用三菨16X DVD-R (MCC 03RG20)測試了得出以下結果:
是DVR-109的差勁表現, 還是我的這台機的問題?要退貨嗎? PLS HELP, THANKS!!!  |
|||||||
2005-05-04, 12:40 AM
#1
|
|
|
Amateur Member
 
加入日期: Feb 2005
文章: 42
|
疑......不是說109不能測片子的好壞嗎?我的都不能測說
__________________
 我們都老得太快 卻聰明得太遲 |
||
|
2005-05-04, 01:24 AM
#2
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Feb 2001 您的住址: 台北市,台灣
文章: 1,756
|
退吧退吧，XX尾端出廠標準沒潤滑到測出來就是這樣。
Nec不買硬去買先鋒、華碩、benq能說什麼。 |
|
2005-05-04, 01:46 AM
#3
|
|
|
Advance Member
  加入日期: Aug 2004
文章: 445
|
要判斷你的DVR-109是否正常，不能單靠測試一種碟片，可試燒其它不同的碟片，
看看是否全部都是如此差劣。 此外用PIONEER測片，可靠性不很高，試試用BenQ或Liteon測又如何。 此外，我也被你的測試嚇了一跳，連忙造了以下一個類似的測試 |
|
2005-05-04, 01:53 AM
#4
|
|
|
New Member
加入日期: Oct 2004
文章: 8
|
謝謝2601大大的寶貴測試!! 可否請你再以DVR-109在DVDINFOPRO上再作測試?因小弟除了PIONEER DVR-109 & NU DDW-082就沒有其他的機器啊.
而且你的1.50 FIRMWARE是從哪裡找的?可否提供? |
|
2005-05-04, 08:07 AM
#5
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Feb 2005
文章: 179
|
引用:
真是大傻瓜...用DVR-109 測試不準啦  |
|
|
2005-05-04, 08:17 AM
#6
|
|
|
New Member
加入日期: Oct 2004
文章: 8
|
 I knew the DVR-109 is not suitable to verify the disc quality already & also know the NU DDW-082 is a garbage drive...but I just want to know how to verify my current DVR-109 is in normal condition, or need a replacement.Pls help!!!  |
|
2005-05-04, 09:34 AM
#7
|
|
|
Advance Member
加入日期: Aug 2004
文章: 445
|
看看我用剛才同一張碟，改用PIONEER測試，
效果比你的還差。 v1.50(DVR-109) http://www.pioneer-dvd.com.tw/d_fil...R109_FW150B.EXE |
|
2005-05-04, 10:48 AM
#8
|
|
|
New Member
加入日期: Oct 2004
文章: 8
|
謝謝2601大大的寶貴測試!!
Your CD-DVD Speed testing is also similar to my result but slightly better. I think the DVR-109 is not recommended for testing in Nero CD-DVD Speed. Could you pls to re-test the same disc with DVDinfoPRO? Pls help me because I want to save my babies photos and home video recordings to DVD for permanent storage. Thanks for millions 可否請你再以DVR-109在DVDINFOPRO上再作測試? |
|
2005-05-04, 12:07 PM
#9
|
|
|
Advance Member
加入日期: Aug 2004
文章: 445
|
引用:
這是同一碟片用DVR-109及DVDInfoPro 3.56的測試， 請注意，你是用約4x read speed做測試，但我因找不到怎樣set Test speed ， 結果只用1.X速度做測試。 |
|
|
2005-05-04, 05:10 PM
#10
|
|
