|
||
|
Regular Member
 加入日期: Sep 2002 您的住址: 台北士林區
文章: 89
|
Nvidia NV 31 and NV34 benchmarks
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=8031
Nvidia NV 31 and NV34 benchmarks EXCLUSIVE 3DMark scores up By Fuad Abazovic: Friday 28 February 2003, 00:13 IT FINALLY MAKES SENSE why Nvidia does not like 3dmark 2003 and why the company has even made public statements against it. We managed to get scores from the latest Futuremark benchmark tool after running it on 2 Nvidia cards that are yet to be introduced. They were the performance mainstream card NV31, likely to be called Geforce FX 5600, and the NV34 mainstream card with the possible name of Geforce FX 5200. The machine these two cards were plugged into was an Athlon 2700+ with 512 MB of RAM. Very similar to the machine we use. The only card we have run 3dmark03 on before now was the Radeon 9700 PRO and that baby, as far as we can remember, scored around 4600 marks. The faster of the two new Nvidia cards, the NV31 scored 2389. We cannot make a comparison to the Radeon 9500 and 9500 PRO as we are away from our LAB at the moment. If someone has a Radeon 9500 PRO and similar configuration we would like to update the article with its result as well. You can note that card is about half the speed of the Radeon 9700 Pro. Its mainstream brother, the NV34 was unable to score more than a thousand. To be precise it got 879 marks making it only 37% of the speed of the NV31. These results may not reflect real in-game performance but sure can give you some conclusions about cards that are not so far away from being publicly launched. It sure gives you a clue why Nvidia could be so harsh about Futuremark. It will be real interesting to compare these scores with RV280 and RV350, the soon to be introduced ATI parts. We might just be able to do that on Tuesday when we got back to lab. µ
__________________
ASUS A7M266D 0307 vpmw 1.7G+ OC 2.6G+ *2 KUTHTEC 2101 COOLER *2 ATI 9700PRO adaptec 39160 scsi card 10000RPM scsi HD 18G,36G各一 15000rpm cheetah 36g PLEXTOR 24X CD-RW USB2.0 PLEXTOR 1210S CD-RW PLEXTOR 40X SCSI CD-ROM SONY DRU-500AX PANASONIC DVD-ROM 16X ENERMAX 465W POWER (ADAPTEC 2200S RAID 休息中) |
|||||||
2003-03-07, 11:12 AM
#1
|
|
|
Senior Member
 
加入日期: Oct 2001 您的住址: 台北 台中 南投
文章: 1,211
|
說實在的 有點不怎樣
|
||
|
2003-03-07, 11:36 AM
#2
|
|
|
Golden Member
加入日期: Feb 2002 您的住址: 台南市
文章: 3,794
|
NV31似乎還差R9500 PRO一大段
 |
|
2003-03-07, 01:02 PM
#3
|
|
|
Regular Member
加入日期: Sep 2002 您的住址: 台北士林區
文章: 89
|
沒錯,在此項測試nv31,nv34的確是粉慘
__________________
ASUS A7M266D 0307 vpmw 1.7G+ OC 2.6G+ *2 KUTHTEC 2101 COOLER *2 ATI 9700PRO adaptec 39160 scsi card 10000RPM scsi HD 18G,36G各一 15000rpm cheetah 36g PLEXTOR 24X CD-RW USB2.0 PLEXTOR 1210S CD-RW PLEXTOR 40X SCSI CD-ROM SONY DRU-500AX PANASONIC DVD-ROM 16X ENERMAX 465W POWER (ADAPTEC 2200S RAID 休息中) |
|
2003-03-07, 01:28 PM
#4
|
|
|
Elite Member
  
加入日期: Mar 2002 您的住址: 台北市
文章: 4,505
|
引用:
要是照官方定價賣的話競爭力完全沒有…  |
|
|
2003-03-07, 01:50 PM
#5
|
|
|
Master Member
加入日期: Dec 2000 您的住址: Cambridge Law School
文章: 1,780
|
R9600 Pro與NV31在一些測試項目輸R9500 Pro,這是很正常的,效能不代表商品的好壞,至少ATI與NVDA都已經用較高頻率的RAM來彌補,誰搶較多OEM的訂單誰就贏了
|
|
2003-03-07, 02:17 PM
#6
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Sep 2001 您的住址: 活著就好......
文章: 24
|
引用:
顯示卡不以效能來判斷產品的好壞....要用什麼來判斷呢.... 至於誰搶較多OEM的訂單誰就贏....那是屬於行銷方面的事情.... 買東西不做功課的人....買貴了是他們自己的事.... |
|
|
2003-03-07, 02:24 PM
#7
|
|
|
Elite Member
加入日期: Jan 2002 您的住址: 高雄~高雄站到了
文章: 5,486
|
這是tom姆熊對NV 31/34的評論之簡體翻譯
http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic...3061/index.html (翻譯站翻不出來?) http://www.hardsalon.com/OpenNews.a...uti=12056&kid=1 “……再没有打开FSAA和各项异性过滤的情况下，FX 5600 Ultra与GeForce4 Ti4200-8X和Radeon 9500Pro相当，这可能与其减少的像素流水线有关（NV31实际为4x1或者叫2x2，而NV25是4x2）。在4x FSAA下，FX 5600 Ultra有几乎双倍于4200的性能，同时也击败了4800，但是仍不及Radeon 9500Pro。在个性异性过滤的测试中情况与上述类似。在3DMark2001的Pixel Shader测试中，5600Ultra击败了4200和4800，但是在Vertex Shader测试中不及二者，同时这两项测试都不及Radeon 9500Pro。 FX 5200 Ultra比FX 5600 Ultra稍慢，在抗锯齿和各项异性过滤时，稍微慢于Ti 4200，如果使用性能优先模式，则快于Ti 4800。 ……我们现在可以说，FX5600和FX5200在对抗ATi新产品的时候决不会轻松……” 下面是原文http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic...00-5200-02.html ----------------------------------- However, we can already give you some of our first impressions about the performance of the new cards. In the standard tests without FSAA and anitotropic filtering, the FX 5600 Ultra seems to be just about the same or slower than a GeForce 4 Ti 4200 8x and Radeon 9500 PRO. This might be due to the reduced pixel pipelines (4x1 alias 2x2 (NV31) as opposed to 4x2 in NV25). With 4xFSAA, it appears to reach nearly double the performance of the 4200, beating a 4800 as well, but it loses out to the Radeon 9500 PRO. It's a similar picture with the anisotropic filtering. In the pixel shader tests from 3D Mark 2001, it beats the 4200/2800, but loses in the vertex shader tests. In both tests, it clearly loses to the Radeon 9500 PRO. The FX 5200 Ultra is quite a bit slower than the 5600 Ultra in the standard tests. In anti-aliasing, it's just a tad behing the Ti 4200. It's the same with anisotropic filtering - at least in Balanced mode. In Performance mode, it even manages to beat the 4800. We'll have more for you on this in a few days, including extensive benchmark tables. But this much can be said for now: the FX 5600 and 5200 cards won't have an easy time against the new ATI products 看來GF FX5600Ultra連R9500 PRO都比不過(不管有無開反鋸齒) 何況是接替R9500的R9600了 |
|
2003-03-07, 04:09 PM
#8
|
|
|
Major Member
加入日期: Sep 2002
文章: 258
|
引用:
看你是從哪方面想囉... 以台灣目前的市面上的情況來說... 比效能 NV絕對輸ATI... 但是ATI具有優勢的R9500 PRO以上產品... 一張要價都在7000以上... 你認為能有多少人玩的起? 此文章於 2003-03-07 09:03 PM 被 CUBE0125 編輯. |
|
|
2003-03-07, 08:58 PM
#10
|
|
