瀏覽單個文章
idiot
*停權中*
 

加入日期: Jan 2002
文章: 1,214
引用:
Originally posted by Alexronald


不是ㄇ?
搞清楚再來回答吧!

偶文章內已經寫ㄉ很清楚何種版面何種染料
去求證過再來回po阿

在網路上說話也要負責

如果要回ㄉ是引起爭吵ㄉ文章那就免ㄌ吧你

舉個最簡單ㄉDye經由時間ㄉ精進 例子:
Ricoh r染....低倍速ㄉ時代就免提ㄌ
24x.r染
最新ㄉ32x.r染



If you improve(change) your dye formulation all the time, then what formulation do you want the firmware writers to target?

One should only use one die formulation per ATIP code combination. In many cases the speed rating printed on the disk changes, without a dye formulation change. Although Ricoh did change their Phthalocyanine formulation 4 times over the lifetime, you didn't saw a change in Ritek's code because Ritek marks all the dye formulas supplied by Ricoh as r染. Such is not the case for their own dye like G染.

read

http://www.mitsuicdrstore.com/quality_nh.html

"Since we have not changed our dye formulation in over 5 years, drive manufacturers are able to easily configure their units for our dye. That's why Mitsui CD-R is compatible with every writer & reader on the market--a CD-R that we manufactured 5 years ago will perform the same as the ones made today. "
舊 2002-05-08, 12:26 AM #48
回應時引用此文章
idiot離線中