回應: edward1227

你看漏了 Toms 在最後一頁測試 Summary 第五段英文..

We can only suppose one thing: the dual-channel interface could date from an era well prior to the 845PE/ GE. For overclocking enthusiasts, it may seem like an advantage at first glance that the chipset only allows synchronous operation between the CPU front side bus and the memory. You have to boost the FSB from 133 to 166 Mhz to make optimum use of the DDR333 memory. But internal lab tests have shown that even minimal overclocking raises the performance of the E7205. So, souping up a PC1066 RDRAM platform is not a problem.

Granite Bay 效能不突出只是因為 Dual DDR 鎖死在 266
但由於 Fsb ratio : memory ratio 是跑 synchronous 的 (即 DDR = fsb x2 倍)
所以只要超頻就可輕易突破 Dual 266 的限制..

如其他 website 對 Gigabyte 的 8INXP 的測試 (雖然有部份內容是寫錯了, 如把 Dual 266 的數據當為 Dual351, 但數據卻完全是真的 - sissoft 的測試數據)

只要超上 166fsb, 就可以跑 DDR333,Sissoft 的 Memory bandwidth 就可以輕易達到四五千點的超高水平.. (rambus1066 即 3200-3300左右)

Tomshardware 最後一段指出 : But internal lab tests have shown that even minimal overclocking raises the performance of the E7205. So, souping up a PC1066 RDRAM platform is not a problem.

只要少量超 fsb (如 135, 138, 140), 就可以超越 PC1066 的 RDRAM platform 了....