|
Junior Member
|
這新聞寫了很多值得討論的觀點。
Google 翻譯
引用:
Breyer, of the federal district court in San Francisco, said Trump had not satisfied any of the requirements that must be met in order to call up members of a state’s National Guard and that the president had not complied with a procedural aspect of federal law that requires presidents to issue an order “through the governor” when they want to federalize state troops.
舊金山聯邦地區法院的布雷耶表示，川普沒有滿足召集州國民警衛隊成員的任何要求，而且總統沒有遵守聯邦法律的程序性規定，即總統在想要聯邦化州軍隊時必須「通過州長」發布命令。
Judge: Protests aren’t an insurrection
法官：抗議不是叛亂
In federalizing the guardsmen, Trump pointed to a provision of federal law that says he can call up a state’s troops to suppress a “rebellion.” But Breyer said in his ruling that “the protests in Los Angeles fall far short of ‘rebellion.’”
在將國民警衛隊聯邦化時，川普援引了聯邦法律的一項規定，該規定規定他可以召集一個州的軍隊鎮壓「叛亂」。但布雷耶在裁決中表示，“洛杉磯的抗議活動遠不及‘叛亂’。”
“In short, individuals’ right to protest the government is one of the fundamental rights protected by the First Amendment, and just because some stray bad actors go too far does not wipe out that right for everyone,” Breyer said. “The idea that protesters can so quickly cross the line between protected conduct and ‘rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States’ is untenable and dangerous.”
「簡而言之，個人抗議政府的權利是《第一修正案》所保護的基本權利之一，僅僅因為一些不法分子行為過激，並不意味著所有人的這項權利就被剝奪，」布雷耶說。 “抗議者如此迅速地跨越了受保護行為與‘反抗美國政府權威’之間的界限，這種想法是站不住腳的，也是危險的。”
Ruling doesn’t address use of Marines
裁決並未涉及海軍陸戰隊的使用
|
|