引用:
|
作者oversky.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9
Andersen 這篇是 3 月 17 日發表的。
你發的這篇是 3 月 15 日發表的，
不可能提到 Andersen 的論文，
後面的 Ref. 裏也沒有列。
|
這blog開始並不是專門為andersen那篇寫的，但隨著討論進行，自然就會有人提了
More importantly, Andersen used RaTG13 as the main evidence to support the notion that the virus is of natural origin. If you don't question that (most people usually don't when it's a Nature publication), then Andersen has no major holes to cover in his claims. Most academic people, even if they are paying some attention to this topic, must feel that, given the "existence" of RaTG13, the Wuhan coronavirus can easily come from Nature.
Finally, for people who are convinced that it is man-made, they can't argue for this claim without pointing out that people may have fabricated things like RaTG13 and Pangolin coronaviruses. Articles like mine here have too much politics involved, which makes them not suitable for pretty much all scientific journals. But in reality, it's the CCP that is putting politics into this in the first place. The cover-up with RaTG13 or pangolin viruses is more of what the CCP needs than Shi's personal interests.
他直接就說andersen的基礎是什麼，人造的基礎是什麼。現在人造方就是要舉證來挑戰你得自然說法。所以我才說，拿出科學東西來把人工那方扳倒自然無問題。