Techpowerup對於Nano的牢騷
http://www.techpowerup.com/215776/a...by-tpu-not.html

There won't be a Radeon R9 Nano review on TechPowerUp. AMD says that it has too few review samples for the press. When AMD first held up the Radeon R9 Nano at its "Fiji" GPU unveil, to us it came across as the most promising product based on the chip, even more than the R9 Fury series, its dual-GPU variant, and the food-processor-shaped SFF gaming desktop thing. The prospect of "faster than R9 290X at 175W" is what excited us the most, as that would disrupt NVIDIA's GM204 based products. Unfortunately, the most exciting product by AMD also has the least amount of excitement by AMD itself.

由於Nano數量太少，以Techpowerup那麼知名的網站，也無法拿到樣品測試，
因此TPU將沒有Nano的Review。文章也提到，一些友站也因為同樣原因，無
法進行Review，可見數量相當稀少，連TPU都拿不到，產能應該存在嚴重問題...
(TPU算是公認比較中立的網站，AMD應該會優先給對自己比較友善的單位)



The R9 Nano, on the other hand, has the potential for greatness. Never mind the compact board design and its SFF credentials. Pull out this ASIC, put it on a normal 20-25 cm PCB, price it around $350, and dual-slot cooling that can turn its fans off in idle, and AMD could have had a GM204-killing product. Sadly, there's no way for us to test that, either. We can't emulate an R9 Nano on an R9 Fury X. The Nano appears to have a unique power/temperature based throttling algorithm that we can't copy.

這段和小弟的想法一致，不要去管什麼ASIC，不要去管什麼卡長，找一個效能
與耗能的甜點就好，Fiji就會相當有競爭力。不過現在產能還是拉不上來，縱使
DX12塑造了一個美好的憧憬，但沒有產能就無法提高競爭力。個人預估年底或
明年初產能問題應該可以逐漸紓解，AMD的市佔有望再拉高一些...