引用:
|
作者滄桑v2
http://www.huf.org.tw/essay/content/2410
綜觀國際間輸入日本食品的規範，以與日本貿易交流頻繁的國家為例，美國規範福島等14縣市、韓國訂出13縣市(另有16縣市水產)、中國劃定10個縣市全部食品皆不得進口；另，世界各國早已要求檢附輻射檢測合格證明文件(包括產地證明與檢驗證明)，並搭配各國海關抽驗的方式進行把關。相較於我國只限制日本5縣市，包括福島、茨城、櫪木、群馬、千葉的食品進口(酒、菸尚不在此限)，福島核災已經發生三年多了，我國政府才在主婦聯盟環境保護基金會等公民團體的大力疾呼之下，要求日方提供產地證明及輻射檢驗報告，相關規範緩慢與鬆散得令人難以置信。
---
比起其他國家的標準, 台灣不算片面吧?
|
美國去年就已經減少到只限制福島 群馬 茨城 栃木四縣市而已
而且這四縣市的部分農產加工品只要有放射合格檢驗證明還是可以進口
FDA在去年3月就已公開說明，沒有任何證據顯示福島的食品有任何問題
To date, FDA has no evidence that radionuclides from the Fukushima incident are present in the U.S. food supply at levels that would pose a public health concern. This is true for both FDA-regulated food products imported from Japan and U.S. domestic food products, including seafood caught off the coast of the United States. Consequently, FDA is not advising consumers to alter their consumption of specific foods imported from Japan or domestically produced foods, including seafood. FDA continues to closely monitor the situation at and around the Fukushima Dai-ichi facility, as it has since the start of the incident and will coordinate with other Federal and state agencies as necessary, standing ready to take action if needed, to ensure the safety of food in the U.S. marketplace.