瀏覽單個文章
天屎~加百列
Master Member
 

加入日期: Jul 2001
您的住址: 天堂
文章: 1,688
引用:
作者Axel_K
In the long run, this will all be for the best, of course—if we build the infrastructure for renewable energy, eventually the cost-savings will be evident (and hopefully the impact on our environment even more so). Plus, the antiquated tech that brings that coal/nuclear blend to our homes certainly needs to be eradicated—it's old, inefficient and dangerous.

But if customers start seeing their bills go up, they'll freak out and blame the renewable energy sources, says Alex Leupp, of the Northern California Power Agency. "If power gets too expensive, there will be a revolt," Leupp said. "If the state pushes too fast on renewables before the technology is viable, it could set back the environmental goals we all believe in a...


可惜的是下面回文的那些美國鄉民仍然是盲目的

這篇文章並不是吹捧Renewable Energy
第二段則是明確指出
美國的政策在Renewable Energy技術尚未成熟前就強推
反而會造成反作用 方向是對的 可是技術上難以實施 最後只會淪為口號

推廣Renewable Energy不是改好電廠連上線就好
整個基礎電力架構都得跟著大改 這才是成本所在
例如風能跟太陽能都無法解決因為工業用電減少(原來工業用電減少會造成電網不穩定??)
造成的電網不穩定問題(頻率變動/電壓變動)
也是老美現在無法將Renewable Energy政策往上推到超過50%電力來源的一大因素
__________________
初學者的無知在於未學,學者的無知在於學後...



你曾經愛過的人使你失望之後,
他看起來就似乎有了許多缺點。
Schultz 人格理論
舊 2014-04-28, 11:13 AM #4
回應時引用此文章
天屎~加百列離線中