瀏覽單個文章
Axel_K
Elite Member
 
Axel_K的大頭照
 

加入日期: Sep 2006
您的住址: 人群中
文章: 4,213
In the long run, this will all be for the best, of course—if we build the infrastructure for renewable energy, eventually the cost-savings will be evident (and hopefully the impact on our environment even more so). Plus, the antiquated tech that brings that coal/nuclear blend to our homes certainly needs to be eradicated—it's old, inefficient and dangerous.

But if customers start seeing their bills go up, they'll freak out and blame the renewable energy sources, says Alex Leupp, of the Northern California Power Agency. "If power gets too expensive, there will be a revolt," Leupp said. "If the state pushes too fast on renewables before the technology is viable, it could set back the environmental goals we all believe in at the end of the day." [Los Angeles Times]

就擷取這後面一段
美國這麼大的地,都知道往對的方向走,都知到這是long run的能源政策
一個負責任的政府,明知人民只看到「電源成本」,卻看不到背後的「環境成本」,還是推動更環保的能源。

美國有的我們沒有
1.廣大的土地,可以把核能電廠蓋在人口稀少的地區
2.在有條件1之下,依然推動提高renewable能源使用
3.政府明知短期可能會造成反彈,只要政策long run是正確的,毅然推動

台灣,沒有第1條件下,明知long run也是錯誤的,毅然往錯的方向走下去
愚蠢又沒長遠眼光,先撈再說


 
舊 2014-04-28, 09:38 AM #2
回應時引用此文章
Axel_K現在在線上