瀏覽單個文章
nemovyagudin
Basic Member
 

加入日期: Jul 2013
文章: 17
Smile (情報)AMD Steamroller FX 9650 Benchmarks!

重點截錄
1. 30% more Ops / Cycle = 20% IPC Benefit over Piledriver

Assuming 45% increase in performance vs Bulldozer (First Gen) and a 32% increase in performance vs Piledriver (Second Gen). This is taken directly from AMD!

2.
source
IPC will lie somewhere between Nahelem and Sandy Bridge , falling behind Haswell by only 25-30%.


POV Ray 3.7 - Multithreaded Test Score

Intel

4C/8T - Intel i7 3770k : 1363

6C/12T - Intel i7 3970x : 1888

AMD

4M/8T - AMD FX 8350 : 1505

4M/8T - AMD FX 9450 : 1636

4M/8T - AMD FX 9650 : 1985

(determined with 32% increase in performance over the FX 8350)

source

Cinebench 11.5 Score - Single Core Test

Intel

4C/8T - Intel i7 3770k : 1.66

6C/12T - Intel i7 3970x : 1.62

AMD

4M/8T - AMD FX 8350 : 1.11

4M/8T - AMD FX 9450 : 1.21

4M/8T - AMD FX 9650 : 1.47


Cinebench 11.5 Score - Multi-core Test


Intel

4C/8T - Intel i7 3770k : 7.52

6C/12T - Intel i7 3970x : 10.84

AMD

4M/8T - AMD FX 8350 : 6.93

4M/8T - AMD FX 9450 : 7.55

4M/8T - AMD FX 9650 : 9.15

source

---
資料來源

http://amdfx.blogspot.tw/2013/05/am...ghz-48-ghz.html

重點翻譯與截錄
1. Steamroller與Piledriver相比大約可以進步~30%(20%IPC+10%時脈提升)
2. 而相對於Bulldozer,進步幅度大約有45%
3. 單線程線能仍然敵不過 Ivy系列,但多線程可超越 Ivy i7系列

另外值得注意的是
Steamroller FX 9650 - 4.5 Ghz / 4.8 Ghz Turbo (好高的默認頻率)
猜測一般桌上版的頻率應該不會用這麼高才對

雖然實際的產品還沒出來,但是如果真正的steamroller產品出來後能追上二代 i5 2500
其實就已經滿有價值的了~~~非常期待Kaveri APU能為我們帶來的驚喜!!
     
      
舊 2013-07-07, 02:06 PM #1
回應時引用此文章
nemovyagudin離線中