人家明明只是一如往常地，

很客觀地描述台灣的現況。


除了指出政府的問題之外，

也曾數次主動替馬政府解釋，

甚至還有一點貶民眾的意味：


"Public anger first arose... Few Taiwanese understood why, even though Taiwan’s state-owned power company loses billions."

"Exports account for 70% of GDP. So some of Taiwan’s problems are down to the dismal state of rich-world economies."

"Nothing suggests Mr Ma’s main policies will change (or that they should)."

www.economist.com/news/asia/21566657-former-heart-throb-loses-his-shine-ma-bumbler


那個括號就很明顯了，

一堆人沒看清楚意思，見影子就開槍，

平常也沒看國際刊物，才會大驚小怪...