瀏覽單個文章
moninca09
Junior Member
 

加入日期: Oct 2004
文章: 890
引用:
作者linczs2000
我的想法是這樣,60GB的一半跟120GB的一半哪個能有更大的空間讓控制晶片私下使用,60GB連OP1+OP2都一樣小一倍啊

下面這段就講得更清楚了
In theory, read speeds shouldn't be significantly impacted by the drive's free space. But there is a noticeable drop-off on the lower-capacity SF-22xx-based SSDs. Compression is one reason for this. Compressed data has to be decompressed, which requires sufficient free space. SandForce's garbage collection mechanism is a second explanation. Because most of its clean-up happens in the foreground, decompression requires a rotation of scratch space so that the NAND wears out evenly. This is known as wear leveling.


Both factors penalize the 60 GB drives we're rounding up more than the larger models as a result ...


這段的意思蠻奇怪的....SF光做讀取都需要額外的空間解壓縮?
這實在太傷Flash的壽命了吧

我們說一個2M壓縮成1M的檔案,SF雖然只寫入1M
但系統看到暫去的空間還是2M,只是有1M的Flash是空著的
假如他在讀取時,還需要一個另外2M的空間把他解壓縮出來放著再讀出來
這樣SF的SSD光做讀取就不斷的在耗損Flash的壽命了
舊 2012-05-30, 06:04 PM #16
回應時引用此文章
moninca09離線中