有些人因為在網路不小心發言而被人肉, 我總覺得這些人不應該被這樣迫害.

拿一些最近案例,
- 護士寫說 "手染血的感覺有快感"
- 一些人對於時事的一時不當發言
(暫時想不到過去的新聞...)

然後接下來就被"人肉", 民眾這樣的民族性跟暴民有啥兩樣?

有些人大概白目, 但是也是個人自由, 也沒觸法, 但是卻遭處罰, 還要道歉.

台灣這樣哪來的真正言論自由?
當然 台灣人很重"倫理" "道德" (批評別人的時候, 最會用)
(其中當然與媒體亂象也有很大關係)

先進國家強調言論自由, 一堆人在Youtube互罵是很常見的, 也沒有動不動就告對方.
隨便一句話, 台灣法官就判罵人者賠錢. 如果不是恐龍法官, 難道是社會正義?

以上為不專業之想法, 請相關專家詮釋詮釋看法.......

Wikipedia:
Freedom of speech is the freedom to speak freely without censorship. The term freedom of expression is sometimes used synonymously, but includes any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used. In practice, the right to freedom of speech is not absolute in any country and the right is commonly subject to limitations, such as on libel, slander, obscenity, incitement to commit a crime, etc.

"the right to hold opinions without interference"

"everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice"

OK 我是看了Thurgood電影才有感而發