根據英文規則, 應該是賽場裁判檢查的那一段, 而不是檢錄階段

我找到世跆盟的英文規則 2010年版
Competition_Rules_(Tashkent_version_final_2010).pdf

裡面第25頁, article 14 prohibited acts and penalties 的 5.2.7 全文

Before each round of competition, the referee shall check whether any attempts were made to manipulate the scoring system and/or increase sensitivity of the sensing socks, or any other method, by
the athlete.

這一段講裁判在 each round of competition 前要檢查選手有沒有增加電子襪感應器靈敏度的企圖或方法

In the event that the referee finds intentional manipulation, the referee shall reserve the right to give “Gam-jeom” to the pertinent contestant and shall reserve the right to declare the violating
athlete as the loser by penalty based on the degree of seriousness of the violation.

這一段講裁判在 event 中抓到 intentional manipulation, 就可以扣分和可以依據違規的嚴重程度判選手落敗

所以根據規則, 裁判是有抓到楊淑君的違規企圖或方法
我們頂多只能爭辯楊淑君違規的嚴重程度足不足夠判落敗

下載英文規則的網頁地址
http://www.wtf.org/wtf_eng/site/new...709fc8c2c30c539

中下方 file 2 的 Competition_Rules_(Tashkent_version_final_2010).pdf