引用:
|
作者auroraxxx
所以你是期待你媽煮的更好 還是你媽用高科技煮?
表示妳媽不用高科技煮就是難吃 就是沒進步?
還是你要回答~喔~我期待我媽用高科技煮的更好~
足球用不用高科技根本不在結果好不好~ 不用的原因只是有礙流暢性
重點在流暢性與連慣性~所以今年的歐足聯杯有了底線的裁判而不是加入什麼樣的科技
難不成棒球是用機器在判好壞球? 拿網球跟棒球比足球 根本是藍鳥比雞腿
既然好壞球有一定準則~到底為啥不用機器~用什麼有屁個人喜好的主審
於場上跑選手的除了門將有20個~你要停個幾秒好像覺的沒什麼
那你覺得裁判不斷吹哨的比賽如何?
每次出界都先看一下機器是誰碰出去的~等看了再說~所以補時要多久?
然後又覺的補時很不公平~要像籃球~時間到了就到了~
再說辦球賽的是FIFA~不是選手跟教練~選手跟教練覺得三小朋友~那是他家的事情
還有FIFA官員也是屁話~什麼今年用不用~下一屆還有四年~規則改了再...
|
我期待的進步是更公平更公正 更少因為裁判的錯誤造成球員的遺憾...
上面引過的這篇有回答你的問題了
http://g.sports.yahoo.com/soccer/wo...play062710.html
Oh, there is going to be endless discussion between fans on this. Does Blatter think this is better? An entire nation feeling cheated? Fans robbed of a legendary second half of action after the English having mounted a brave comeback from a 2-0 hole? A referee left to global scorn?
Soccer doesn’t need every decision to be reviewed. Fouls, yellow cards and red cards could remain the judgment of the referee. A goal is different, especially in soccer.
Instead of a 30-second replay review that could’ve solved the problem and guaranteed an honest game, we’ll get weeks, months and even decades of condemnation of the missed call.