文章下面的回應有提到


The latency test of Cpu-2 tells us that the (6 MB) L3 cache latency is 42-43 cycles at 2.2 GHz (seen from a 2.7 GHz CPU). Not bad at all as the same 2 MB cache did 48 cycles at 2 GHz on Barcelona (2.5 GHz CPU). So it seems that the latency has decreased while the L3-cache is 3 times bigger.

The Cache subsystem is now one of the strongpoints of AMD compared to Intel's Nehalem.

這意味著上海的L3效能是有進步的???????

(翻譯錯誤請大大指證 )

不管上海是否戰勝的了Nehalem，希望可以賣便宜一點可以讓我無痛升級
大學生可是很窮的