瀏覽單個文章
proton63
Basic Member
 

加入日期: Nov 2004
文章: 11
說法:
世界衛生組織(WHO)近日針對三聚氰胺含量訂出每日安全攝取量標準,且為歐盟、紐西蘭及英國等先進國家採用。

事實:
TDI 翻譯成 "安全"攝取量標準 是害死人,應該翻譯成 "極限"攝取量標準,


WHO
http://www.who.int/foodsafety/fs_ma...nt/Melamine.pdf

No human data could be found on the oral toxicity of melamine. Data are available from
animal feeding studies carried out in rats, mice and dogs.

你知道引用的毒性數據都還只是在貓、狗、老鼠等階段,人體實驗部份相信會由對岸接力完成。

黑心食品連加的三聚氰胺也可能是黑心的,一大堆衍生化合物,還有其他可能不清楚的機轉。

Quote:
It has to be noted that this approach has a large uncertainty. For melamine toxicity species
differences in toxicokinetics have been reported and insufficient information is available
regarding specific sensitivity of infants. There is also a lack of information on the
interaction of melamine and cyanuric acid. Also, dietary exposure to melamine and
structural analogues as result of migration from food contact material or from other
sources is not included, but this source of exposure can normally be considered low.
Therefore, when considering regulatory actions to be taken on contaminated food products
potential human health impact, availability of foods and other factors should be taken into
account. Investigations into source(s) of melamine contamination should be carried out in
all cases to the extent possible.

意思是說之前屎研所的說法:15公斤毒奶粉毒不死人的推論,沒有站得住腳的地方。
總之一切要等對岸接力完成的部份,才有辦法判斷長期服用的影響。

轉貼雀巢最新聲明:
http://www.nestle.com.tw/01_news_de...p?sn=239&page=1
[/QUOTE]
舊 2008-10-02, 08:38 PM #14
回應時引用此文章
proton63離線中