http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews...pu,1947-11.html

The public’s reasoning might proceed something like this:

"An Eee PC 900 for $450 (good) with a Celeron (not good) at 900 MHz (not good)" [offer computers at a "very low"(?) price]
or
"An Eee PC 901 for $450 (good) with an Atom (good) at 1.6 GHz (good)”[good brand image.]

A paradoxical platform: The processor is a success (even if its performance is weak in absolute terms), whereas the associated chipsets are not worth their salt.

東西不差(達到製造者的目標,卻滿足不了使用者便宜大碗的心態),目前ATOM性能 純牧場來說還好,但是用c3,c7花費省多了,若是流量大,改用p-m,cerelon可以,
NB core(2)(duo)的mini-itx算是效能上得去的htpc.
等intel整個配合atom晶片都到齊了,或許會有不一樣的風貌,c8亦同...