你還真是贅言大師, 1965年的圖底下就明白寫著這行字
"A view of the sky as it would have been seen by the microwave receiver of Penzias and Wilson, if it had surveyed the whole sky in 1965. The receiver was not sensitive enough to detect temperature variations in the Cosmic Background Radiation."
接收器不夠靈敏, 無法偵測到宇宙背景輻射的溫度波動.

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/...son-lecture.pdf
讀一讀 Wilson 在 1978 年寫的故事吧 THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND
RADIATION Nobel Lecture, 8 December, 1978 by ROBERT W. WILSON
這篇 1978 諾貝爾物理獎論文裡, Wilson 測量的溫度頂多到小數點下兩位. (e.g. He Temp 4.22, Balance 2.73, Total C.L. 7.33 .....)

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/...ias-lecture.pdf
也麻煩你讀一讀 Penzias 在 1978 年寫的故事吧
THE ORIGIN OF ELEMENTS Nobel Lecture, 8 December, 1978

不過最糟糕的基本邏輯錯誤就是 -- 假設 1965, 1970 年時早就知道宇宙背景輻射有10^-4~10^-5度的波動. 那麼 2006 NASA 還能夠拿1965, 1970 年代的結果獲獎嗎? 你這位贅言大師, 拜託發言的時候用點腦好嗎?