引用:
|
作者usam
建議大家看英文原文報導，那篇東森的翻譯報導真是有夠嘩眾取寵的。
這段警官的說法竟然完全不提：
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patrick McDonald, the U.S. Marshal in Boise, said appropriate security protocols were
followed in the Sept. 20 matter, and guards suggested she simply remove the bra in
her car outside, or find a restaurant bathroom.
"She's inflating it," McDonald said. "All of a sudden she just took it off. It wasn't
anything we wanted to happen and it wasn't anything we asked for her to do. She did
it so fast."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
根本是各說各話，兩邊說法差很多。
|
答對了, 這女的大概被刁過幾次都沒能過關. 所以才會不爽到當場脫. 機場安檢也只是拿手持金屬探測器掃描一下就過關. 法院怎麼差那麼多?
*****************************************************
Generally, McDonald said, undergarments aren't considered a danger to security. "I don't think they're considered a weapon, really, the last time I looked," he said. He declined to discuss other ways the federal courthouse guards could have screened Plato for weapons.
*****************************************************
警衛自己也承認內衣應該不會對安全構成威脅, 那麼又何必要人家脫掉胸罩呢?