今天的Dailytech, 又有續集
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=5874
看來agena不是dual core, 而是Quad core, agena和 agena FX的差別在於socket不同
AMD's Agena FX codename also appears to still exist on the roadmap. The only difference at this point between Agena and Agena FX is that Agena FX will use the Socket 1207+ interface
Rana, the next-generation Sempron successor codename, will launch with frequencies in the 2.1 to 2.3 GHz range. The dual-core CPUs will feature 1MB of total L2 cache, but no L3 cache. Rana's TDP is rated at 65W.
看來agena不是dual core, 而是Quad core, agena和 agena FX的差別在於socket不同
而且sempron 也不再是單核心了

Agena: 4 cores, 2M L2, 2M L3, 2.4~2.6G when launched, TDP 125W, 最早發布
Kuma: 2 cores, 1M L2, 2M L3, 2.0~2.9G when launched, TDP 65W/89W, 會有35W EE edition
Rana: 2 cores, 1M L2, no L3, 2.1~2.3G when launched, TDP 65W, 和Kuma EE一起發佈 (最晚)

不過這40%...真的令人匪夷所思, 假設上面的是真的
那Agena/FX的對手就是Kentsfield QE/QX系列, Kuma對上Conroe, Rana對上Allendale Pentium E
就算折半算好了, 20%, 以時脈如此相近, 也就是說 Kuma 2.0G 約等於E6600
換言之, K8轉至K8L後, 同時脈效能要提升50%!! (落後20% 變領先20%)
這還只算20%,不是40%, 如果是40%, 那要提升70%!!!
即使K7轉至K8, 除了遊戲效能, 其他方面也不及50%, K8L真有這麼強的實力?
越來越好玩了