瀏覽單個文章
lompt
*停權中*
 

加入日期: May 2004
文章: 2,140
另外
NAV沒跑出98趴
他只有15%
Retrospective / ProActive
的意義如下
This test shows the pure proactive ON-DEMAND detection capability that the scanners had 3 months ago (7th August 2006) with best possible detection settings.
To determine how good a scanner is in detecting zoo-samples on-demand in general with updated signatures, have a look on our February and August tests.
In order to have the highest available protection and proactive detection capabilities, keep your Anti-Virus always up-to-date.
Detection failures in a retrospective test are not up for discussion. Products which cause many false alarms can only get the STANDARD award.
Please rely on the reached certification levels and NOT on the percentages.
表示利用舊有病毒碼 搭配防毒核心偵測能力去做測試
所測試的並非病毒碼多寡
而是核心的偵測原理之能力
換個角度來看
也是針對新款變種病毒的防護能力
這也就是這個測試的意義所在
不然只要測On-demand detection就好啦
他的On-demand detection樣本WIN平台的也有32萬多的病毒以及蠕蟲等等 而且會不停更新替換
包含DOS種類的甚至高達55萬隻之多
其實不算少了
舊 2006-12-16, 03:35 PM #90
回應時引用此文章
lompt離線中