引用:
作者nu_type77
BENQ是最易讓人感覺有作弊之嫌,因為他離CAT的測試基差異很大,反觀PIONEER的測試上,以A08,A09來說(A10,A11可有差),是比較接近於CAT的測試結果PI/PIF,可是放進去很多片子都會很難看說...
所以測試上只須參考不需刻意為標準...
|
王大,以下是CD Speed作者的關於Benq機子對CATS數據對應性的
發言:
「I've been discussing the Disc Quality test with BenQ for a few weeks now.
BenQ recommends scanning at 2.4x (or 1.2x). At this speed the scans are more comparable to CATS. At higher speeds the results may look bad with certain discs even though these discs can be read fine.
For good discs the scanning speed doesn't matter much.」
另外,這是CDFreaks新發表的主題-
『CD-DVD Speed - A user guide』,裡面的第三章講解的是
Disc Quality Guideline,開頭簡介講了一段話:
「Moreover, not all burners can do quality test. To provide a list of all burners able to do scans it's really difficult; as a rule of thumb, all Lite-On and BenQ drives can do this test;
also some Pioneer and some NEC burners can do quality test, but their reliability is rather variable. Plextor burners are among the best burners able to do quality test, but they are not supported by CD-DVD Speed (Plextor drives must use a proprietary software named Plextools).」
這篇CD-DVD Speed - A user guide寫得蠻詳盡的,如果不介意整篇英文,倒是很建議一讀。新手想知道Disc Quality那一章也建議一讀。
