引用:
|
作者mastiff
華航名古屋空難這架A300在1994年當時是新機種,也是擁有飛行軟體控制的機種,可以自動飛行,但也因為駕駛不熟悉操作方式,犯下許多錯誤,讓飛行軟體在最後一刻決定接管飛機,也剛好是A300要進場(Approache the run way接近跑道)時,當時正副駕駛決定要降落,但軟體決定重飛(GA)模式,產生人機爭奪情況,結果飛機機頭上揚呈現落地姿態,但發動機因為採取重飛模式而推力增加,整架A300就如同沖天炮般持續爬升,最後仰角過大而失速墜毀(部分內容為英翻中)
各位有興趣可以查一下當時座艙語音通話記錄器錄下的內容,就可以知道人機爭奪的情況相當嚴重.....
|
請問mastiff還是dighole兄，在
失事調查報告中是哪一段說“飛行軟體在最後一刻決定接管飛機”和“軟體決定重飛(GA)模式”？
我怎麼看調查報告上寫的是副駕駛不小心觸動了重飛模式，而不是飛控軟體接管飛機決定重飛。
節錄自華航名古屋失事調查報告
AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT 96-5
China Airlines
Airbus Industrie A300B4-622R, B1816
Nagoya Airport
April 26, 1994
Sections 4
4. CAUSES
While the aircraft was making an ILS approach to Runway 34 of Nagoya Airport, under manual control by the F/O, the F/O inadvertently activated the GO lever, which changed the FD (Flight Director) to GO AROUND mode and caused a thrust increase. This made the aircraft deviate above its normal glide path.
The APs were subsequently engaged, with GO AROUND mode still engaged. Under these conditions the F/O continued pushing the control wheel in accordance with the CAP's instructions. As a result of this, the THS (Horizontal Stabilizer) moved to its full nose-up position and caused an abnormal out-of-trim situation.
The crew continued approach, unaware of the abnormal situation. The AOA increased the Alpha Floor function was activated and the pitch angle increased. It is considered that, at this time, the CAP (who had now taken the controls), judged that landing would be difficult and opted for go-around. The aircraft began to climb steeply with a high pitch angle attitude. The CAP and the F/O did not carry out an effective recovery operation, and the aircraft stalled and crashed.