很多報告都出來了吧
連Tomshardware都有了(English)....
Game效能還是AMD強
像office,轉檔那方面的工作等..還是Intel優秀點
就算6xx系列和AMD 64各有千秋好了

問題是Prescott架構->高貴高溫又耗電...
Intel 不推出新架構..就算加入64位元我還是不想買

我現在用的就是Prescott 478的第一代噴火龍(2.8EG @ 233*14)
換了西華的Case...前後12CM,側板有3G導管風扇
溫度才壓低十度...目前機殼內溫度約:30度
CPU待機36~38, 全速45~47
熱阻抗0.12 c/w 耗功率95W
花了我1800....只是因為怕Prescott夏天掛點....

連結如下
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20050221/index.html

Tom最後還說了一段話完全說中我的心聲
We would like to call the recent Pentium 4 a "face-lifted Prescott," since all the actions Intel took help to improve an existing product, but don't change its fundamentals. And given this, we must wonder why Intel is asking the user to pay so much more for features that cannot be called truly innovative. The new models really offer differ from the 500 series in offering SpeedStep and the larger cache. Why does this have to cost between 25 and 45% more?