http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread...5&page=12&pp=25
Re: CDSpeed v3 Disc Quality Test
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerDembo
Erik, I don't know what you did but I can scn now using my BenQ DW822 in an Oxford enclosure - yeeeesssss It's amazing how you see the result of different burners, different media etc.... A whole new world
I was this close to buying an Aopen1648 to replace my Pioneer 106s (might still do it though - if there is any way to donate whatever I can afford I gladly will. Keep up the good work - I just hope that Ahead let's you keep on playing with CDSpeed - it is an incredible tool!
That's good to hear
No need for a donation. Nero CD-DVD Speed is real freeware
錸︰ CDSpeed v3 光碟質量檢驗
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
報價︰
最初透過DerDembo公佈
艾利克，我但是我能scn(現下使用包圍牛津DW822 BenQ) - yeeeesssss 你怎樣看見不同的燃燒器，不同的媒介等等的結果是驚人的 .... 一整個新世界
我接近于買一Aopen1648 替換我開發者106 s的這(可能仍然做它，可是 - 如果有捐贈的任何方法，無論我能承擔什麼，我高興將。 保持好工作 - 我只希望在前面讓我們你繼續和CDSpeed玩 - 它是一件難以置信的工具﹗
那適宜聽到
並不為一筆捐款需要。 尼羅CD -DVD速度是真正的自由軟體
Re: CDSpeed v3 Disc Quality Test
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by minix
I can confirm the same with CDSpeed 3.30 and 3.40:
LG GCE-8320B (v1.04), the version with 2MB of buffer, only scans pressed discs.
With CDRs, CDSpeed spins the drive, and then it does nothing.
I don't have any nForce mobo, it has an intel BX chipset.
Anyway, great program.
I will try to find an LG GCE-8320B to run some tests.
It's a strange problem.
錸︰ CDSpeed v3 光碟質量檢驗
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
報價︰
最初透過minix公佈
我能用CDSpeed 3.30和3.40 確認相同︰
LG GCE 8320B(v1.04)，有2 MB緩沖區的版本，只是掃描壓的光碟。
由於CDRs，CDSpeed紡運動， 然後它什麼也沒做。
我沒有任何nForce mobo，它有一個intel BX晶片組。
不論如何，重要的計畫。
我將努力發現一LG GCE 8320B 運轉一些試驗。
它是一個奇怪的問題。
Re: CDSpeed v3 Disc Quality Test
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halcyon
Thanks for the update! I can report a slight speed increase when scanning on DW1620 using 8x setting (up to 1.6x now on my comp).
I know there aren't any units on the graphs yet, but I don't think 48 723 PIF is possible in any reasonable scanning interval.
For PIF, I think the maximum for 32 ECC blocks summed is 208 (PI rows / ECC block) x 32 (ECC blocks) = 6 656 erroneus PI rows (=PIF).
POE could be up to that high. Based on how calculated and implemented, I think POE could be as high as 6656 * 167 = 1 111 5552 for each 32 ECC block summed window (if I understand the DVD spec right).
I think all of this would make more sense to my little brain, if common units were labelled and graphed on the charts (please, pretty please ).
I know the point is not to get absolute numbers. However, when graphing known unit measures we could at least check if the drives are actually reporting figures that are even theoretically possible, or if they are just misbehaving and reporting 'whatever'.
cheers,
halcyon
I've checked it and the second graph indeed shows PO errors instead of PI failures.
Also the unit of measurement is in bytes and not columns.
There are a lot of bytes in 64 ECC blocks
錸︰ CDSpeed v3 光碟質量檢驗
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
報價︰
最初透過平靜公佈
感謝更新﹗ 我報告能，輕微速度增加什麼時候掃描在DW1620上使用幾8x(在我comp主題的上現下到1.6x)確定。
我知道在圖上沒有任何件，但是我認為48 723 PIF在任何合理的掃描間隔不是不可能的。
對于PIF來說， 我為32思考最大量 ECC塊合計208(PI 排/ ECC街區)x 32(ECC街區)= 6 656 erroneus PI(= PIF)排。
波可能能達到那么高。 基于怎樣計算並且實現， 我思考波 可能適合合計(我理解右的DVD spec如果)的窗子的每32 ECC塊6656 * 167 1 111 5552 =高是。
我全部想過這將隨著我的小大腦很有意義， 如果普通單位被貼標籤並且在圖表(請，漂亮，請)上用膠版印刷。
我知道點將不要得到絕對數。 但是， 什麼時候用膠版印刷知道單位測量我們能至少檢查是否運動實際上正報告甚至理論上可能的數字， 或者如果他們正行為不當和報告'無論什麼'。
乾杯，
平靜
我已經檢查它，第2 張圖的確讓郵電亭看錯誤而不是PI錯誤。
此外測量單位用位元組而並非專欄。
在64個ECC塊有許多位元組
Re: CDSpeed v3 Disc Quality Test
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by asdf
Hi Erik,
I like the comparable graphs and comparable quality scores on the V3.40, it's a nice feature with color in the back ground . However, when you have time, can you take look at this?
Both picture scan the same disc on the same day, it think the disc has booktype of DVD-ROM on DVD-R so the word PRINCO didn't show up on LiteOn, likely disc/drive combo issue. The disc is burned with LiteOn with strategy swap.
I know that you set BTC's green background at 4 PIF rating, yellow at 10(?), and 10+ is red, same as what I saw for my LiteOn. However, you will notice that BTC is showing much much higher values in both PI and PIF , eventhough both drive have the same MTK chip.
If possible, could you ask BTC (or if you already) what the ratio suppose to be for the BTC drives in order to get comparable quality and graph? Also you notice the background is not showing red on BTC's picture, I think the red background stop showing from certain PIF value, but I don't know the exact PIF where the red background stopped showing up.
Thank you for your work. This is a really useful free program.
I think the BTC drives use a scanning interval of 42 ECC blocks (LiteOn drives use an interval of 1 ECC block) which would explain the big difference.
I will check with BTC.
I will also try to find out what's going on with the red background.
錸︰ CDSpeed v3 光碟質量檢驗
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
報價︰
最初透過asdf公佈
喂艾利克，
我在V3.40上喜歡可比較的圖和可比較的質量得分，這是有在背面地的顏色的一個好的特徵。 不過，你有時間什麼時候，你能花費考慮這？
兩張圖在同一天掃描相同的光碟， 認為光碟有DVD ROM 的booktype在DVD R上單詞PRINCO不在LiteOn，可能光碟上出現/駕駛取代奶昔兩用機發行。 這個光碟被LiteOn 用策略交換燒毀。
我知道你在等級4 PIF BTC的綠色底子的那個，在10 黃(？) ,10 + 紅，相同我適合我的LiteOn看見什麼當時。 不過，你將注意到BTC 顯示非常高價值在兩個PI兩個PIF 非常，eventhough 兩個都駕駛有相同的MTK 片。
如果可能的話， 能你問BTC(還是如果你已經)那些比率認為什麼給那些BTC駕駛，為了得可比較質量和圖？ 此外背景在BTC的圖上沒顯示紅的你通知， 我認為紅底子停止從一定PIF價值顯示，但是我不知道紅底子停止出現的精確的PIF。
感謝你的工作。 這是一個真的有用的免費計畫。
我認為BTC駕駛使用一(LiteOn駕駛使用一1 ECC街區的間隔)的42 ECC街區的掃描間隔， 將解釋大的差別。
我將以BTC校核。
我也將努力查明什麼正繼續紅底子。