瀏覽單個文章
strong
Elite Member
 
strong的大頭照
 

加入日期: May 2001
您的住址: Andrew Blake 的攝影棚
文章: 9,201
引用:
作者sickman
........................
Powers網友有提到砂之謎,剛好這個討論串有點到了尾聲的感覺想說這部砂之謎其實可以拿來銜接�***的芬圍(砂之謎是比較早的作品),畢竟兩部片子的類型比較相似...而乾材烈火的類型跟池畔謀殺案就南轅北轍了!

台版的砂之謎也發了好一陣子了,不是很醒目就是!對歐容有興趣的網友應該都還是會注意到吧?本來是希望有網友能提出來做個對照說...
...............................


關於 Sickman 提的觀點, 的確有些關聯性!!

請參考下列連結:

http://www.aboutfilm.com/features/sagnier/feature.htm

年輕女演員 Ludivine Sagnier 在她的專訪中, 提到過導演歐容的觀點, 原文節錄如下:

By pairing me with Charlotte in this movie, Francois merges two currents of his cinema. I come from his more stylized current, the conceptual and theatrical one represented by Water Drops on Burning Rocks and 8 Women. Charlotte comes from Under the Sand, a much more intimate film. In Swimming Pool, these two currents clash and electrify each other and the interplay between Julie and Sarah.

Julie is very artificial, verging on vulgar. Sarah is more intellectual and interior. Over the course of the film, we see the two characters confront each other and develop differently: Julie grows introspective while Sarah blossoms physically.

I believe that, with Swimming Pool, Francois wanted to tell a very personal story. About how the boundary between fiction and reality can sometimes be very slight and unsteady. And about creator and muse: how a creator can be overwhelmed by his or her muse and how, conversely, the muse can be completely bled dry by the creator.

總之, 導演融合前兩部作品, 找來原來的女演員, 拍成 Swimming Pool 這部電影, 可說是更為純熟的佳作!!
 
舊 2004-09-22, 02:06 PM #72
回應時引用此文章
strong離線中